Classification of Prostate Cancer with the Use of Artificial Immune System and ANN  

Hasibe Cingilli Vural1 , Seral  ÖZÅžEN2
1. Selcuk University, Department of Biology, Molecular Biology, 42079 Selçuklu, Konya, Turkey

2. Selcuk University,Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 42079 Selçuklu, Konya, Turkey
Author    Correspondence author
Genomics and Applied Biology, 2014, Vol. 5, No. 3   doi: 10.5376/gab.2014.05.0003
Received: 10 Apr., 2014    Accepted: 10 May, 2014    Published: 25 Jul., 2014

© 2014 BioPublisher Publishing Platform
This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Preferred citation for this article:

VURAL and ÖZ?EN, 2014, Classification of Prostate Cancer with the Use of Artificial Immune System and ANN, Genomics and Applied Biology, Vol.5 No.3 1-7 (doi: 10.5376/gab.2014.05.0003)

Abstract

Before analyzing cells in Laboratory in prostate cancer detection, a classification system can give valuable information about the cancer. The purpose of this paper is to assess the value of Artificial Immune System (AIS) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) for classification of prostate cancer cases. Paraffine-embedded prostate cancer tissue specimens of 50 prostate cancer subjects were used in this study. Age range was 35-72 years and all subjects were males. 10 subjects had family history of cancer and 40 patients were non family. An Artificial Immune System (AIS) which is based on clonal selection theory was used to classify these 50 subjects as healthy and patient. With the correct arrangement in system parameters, AIS has reached a classification accuracy of 93.33%. This ratio in 50 data means that in test phase, only one data was misclassified as healthy whereas indeed that data was belonging to a patient. The classification procedure was also done with another method which is a well-known effective classification method for biomedical data: Artificial Neural Networks. The result for this application was 100% with ANN method. While it seems that there is a big difference in the performances of AIS and ANN in the classification accuracy, this difference was only because of 1 data. Thus, it can be said that, AIS is also a good performing classification algorithm as well as ANN for this application.

Keywords
Prostate cancer classification; Artificial immune system; Artificial neural networks
[Full-Text PDF] [Full-Flipping PDF] [Full-Text HTML]
Genomics and Applied Biology
• Volume 5
View Options
. PDF(1385KB)
. FPDF
. HTML
. Online fPDF
Associated material
. Readers' comments
Other articles by authors
. Hasibe Cingilli Vural
. Seral  ÖZÅžEN
Related articles
. Prostate cancer classification
. Artificial immune system
. Artificial neural networks
Tools
. Email to a friend
. Post a comment