Industrial waste management poses significant challenges due to the increasing volume and complexity of waste generated by industrial activities. The improper disposal of industrial waste can lead to severe environmental pollution, including soil contamination, water pollution, and air quality degradation. Traditional waste management methods, such as landfilling and incineration, often result in the release of harmful pollutants and greenhouse gases, exacerbating environmental and public health issues (Hasan et al., 2021; Sakthipriya et al., 2021). Additionally, the depletion of landfill space and the rising costs associated with waste disposal necessitate the development of more sustainable and efficient waste management solutions (Su et al., 2021).

Sustainable waste management is crucial for mitigating the adverse environmental impacts of industrial waste and promoting resource conservation. By adopting sustainable practices, industries can reduce their carbon footprint, minimize waste generation, and recover valuable resources from waste streams. This approach aligns with the principles of a circular economy, where waste is viewed as a resource that can be reused, recycled, or converted into valuable products (Elkhalifa et al., 2019; Igliński et al., 2023). Sustainable waste management not only addresses environmental concerns but also offers economic benefits by reducing disposal costs and creating new revenue streams from recovered materials (Kim et al., 2020).

Pyrolysis is a thermochemical conversion process that decomposes organic materials in the absence of oxygen to produce biofuels, biochar, and syngas. This technology has gained attention as a viable solution for converting industrial waste into valuable energy products. Pyrolysis can process a wide range of waste materials, including municipal solid waste, biomass, plastics, and waste oils, making it a versatile and efficient waste management option. The process conditions, such as temperature and residence time, can be optimized to maximize the yield and quality of the desired products. Recent advancements in pyrolysis technology, including co-pyrolysis and catalytic pyrolysis, have further enhanced its efficiency and product quality.

The study is to explore the application and economic viability of pyrolysis technology for industrial waste management and biofuel production. This study will examine the various types of industrial waste suitable for pyrolysis, the technological advancements in pyrolysis processes, and the economic benefits of adopting pyrolysis for waste valorization. By analyzing the current state of research and development in this field, this study aims to provide insights into the potential of pyrolysis technology to address industrial waste challenges and contribute to sustainable energy production.

1 Pyrolysis Technology: Fundamentals and Mechanisms

1.1 Definition and types of pyrolysis

Pyrolysis is a thermochemical decomposition process of organic material at elevated temperatures in the absence of oxygen. The process can be categorized into three main types based on the heating rate and residence time: Slow Pyrolysis is characterized by a slow heating rate and long residence time, typically resulting in higher yields of biochar. This method is often used for producing solid biochar from biomass (Kabir et al., 2015). Fast Pyrolysis involves the rapid heating of biomass to moderate temperatures (typically around 500 °C) with short residence times, leading to higher yields of bio-oil (Thangalazhy-Gopakumar and Adhikari, 2016; Adelawon et al., 2021). This method is advantageous for liquid fuel production due to its efficiency in converting biomass into bio-oil. Flash Pyrolysis is similar to fast pyrolysis but with even higher heating rates and shorter residence times, resulting in a higher yield of bio-oil and gases. This method is particularly effective for maximizing liquid fuel production (Kabir et al., 2015).

1.2 Chemical and thermal processes involved

The pyrolysis process involves complex chemical and thermal reactions, including several key steps: Dehydration is the removal of water from the biomass, which occurs at lower temperatures. Depolymerization involves the breakdown of large polymeric molecules into smaller molecules. Decarboxylation and decarbonylation refer to the release of CO₂ and CO, respectively, from the biomass. Cracking is the breaking down of large hydrocarbon molecules into smaller ones, which is crucial for bio-oil production (Alcazar-Ruiz et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021).

1.3 Feedstock characteristics and their impact on pyrolysis

The characteristics of the feedstock significantly influence the pyrolysis process and the quality of the end products: Moisture content is a critical factor, as high moisture levels can reduce the efficiency of pyrolysis and the yield of bio-oil (Kabir et al., 2015). Particle size also plays a significant role, with smaller particle sizes generally enhancing the heat transfer rate, leading to more efficient pyrolysis (Adelawon et al., 2021). Composition, particularly the elemental composition such as the hydrogen to carbon ratio (H/Ceff), affects the quality of the bio-oil and the efficiency of the pyrolysis process. For instance, co-pyrolysis with plastics can improve the H/Ceff and enhance hydrocarbon yields (Figure 1) (Alcazar-Ruiz et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021).

1.4 End products: bio-oil, syngas, and biochar

Pyrolysis produces three main types of products: Bio-oil is a liquid product that can be used as a fuel or as a feedstock for chemical production. The quality of bio-oil can be influenced by the type of feedstock and the pyrolysis conditions. For example, the use of catalysts can improve the yield and quality of bio-oil by reducing its acid value (Su et al., 2021; Ahmed et al., 2022). Syngas is a mixture of gases, primarily CO, H₂, and CH₄, which can be used for energy production or as a chemical feedstock. The composition of syngas can be optimized by adjusting the pyrolysis parameters (Kabir et al., 2015). Biochar is a solid residue rich in carbon, which can be used for soil amendment, carbon sequestration, or as a precursor for activated carbon. The yield and properties of biochar depend on the pyrolysis temperature and feedstock characteristics (Foong et al., 2020; Adelawon et al., 2021). By understanding these fundamentals and mechanisms, pyrolysis technology can be effectively applied to convert industrial waste into valuable biofuels, contributing to energy sustainability and waste management.

2 Application of Pyrolysis Technology for Industrial Waste

2.1 Types of industrial wastes suitable for pyrolysis

Pyrolysis technology can be applied to various types of industrial wastes, including plastics, rubber and tires, electronic waste, and agricultural residues. Waste plastics such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polypropylene (PP), and polystyrene (PS) are suitable for pyrolysis. These materials can be transformed into fuels and chemicals through co-pyrolysis with biomass, enhancing the quality of the products (Uzoejinwa et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2021; Vibhakar et al., 2022). Waste rubber and tires are also suitable for pyrolysis. The process can convert these materials into valuable products like fuel oils, which can potentially replace fossil fuels (Kasar et al., 2020). Electronic waste (e-waste) contains various organic and inorganic materials that can be processed through pyrolysis to recover valuable metals and produce energy-rich biofuels (Singh et al., 2020). Agricultural residues such as canola hulls and oat hulls can be effectively managed through pyrolysis, producing biochar and bio-oil, which can be used for energy and soil enhancement (Patra et al., 2021; Vibhakar et al., 2022).

2.2 Pre-treatment requirements for different waste types

Different types of industrial wastes require specific pre-treatment steps to optimize the pyrolysis process. For plastics, sorting and cleaning are essential to remove contaminants and non-plastic materials. Shredding the plastics into smaller pieces can improve the efficiency of the pyrolysis process (Mahari et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021). Rubber and tires require pre-treatment that involves shredding them into smaller pieces to increase the surface area for pyrolysis. It is also necessary to remove metal components from tires (Kasar et al., 2020). Electronic waste (e-waste) requires dismantling to separate the organic and inorganic components. Crushing and grinding can help in reducing the size of the waste for better pyrolysis efficiency (Singh et al., 2020). Agricultural residues need to be dried to reduce moisture content. Grinding the residues into smaller particles can enhance the pyrolysis process (Patra et al., 2021; Vibhakar et al., 2022).

2.3 Process optimization for maximum yield and efficiency

Optimizing the pyrolysis process involves adjusting various parameters to maximize yield and efficiency. Temperature plays a crucial role in the pyrolysis process, significantly affecting the yield and quality of the products. Higher temperatures generally increase the production of bio-oil and gases while reducing biochar yield (Giwa et al., 2018; Patra et al., 2021). The heating rate is another essential factor. A controlled heating rate ensures uniform thermal decomposition. Slow pyrolysis with a lower heating rate tends to produce more biochar, while fast pyrolysis favors bio-oil production (Patra et al., 2021). The feedstock ratio, such as the proportion of biomass to plastic, can influence the synergistic effects and product distribution. Optimal ratios need to be determined experimentally to achieve the desired outcomes (Uzoejinwa et al., 2018; Vibhakar et al., 2022). The use of catalysts can enhance the pyrolysis process by lowering the activation energy and improving the quality of the products. Catalysts like ZSM-5, transition metals, and bifunctional catalysts are commonly used to improve efficiency and product quality (Su et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021).

2.4 Integration with other waste management technologies

Integrating pyrolysis with other waste management technologies can enhance overall efficiency and sustainability. Co-pyrolysis, which involves combining pyrolysis with other processes like gasification or hydrothermal treatment, can improve overall energy recovery and product quality. Co-pyrolysis of plastics with biomass or waste oils has shown promising results in producing high-quality biofuels (Kasar et al., 2020; Su et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021). Effective sorting and recycling of waste materials before pyrolysis can reduce contamination and improve the efficiency of the process. Municipal waste sorting is particularly important for optimizing feedstock quality (Mahari et al., 2021). The biochar produced from pyrolysis can be used for soil enhancement, carbon sequestration, and as an adsorbent for pollutant removal from aqueous solutions (Singh et al., 2020; Patra et al., 2021). By applying these strategies, pyrolysis technology can be effectively utilized for managing industrial waste and producing valuable biofuels, contributing to energy security and environmental sustainability.

3 Economic Analysis of Pyrolysis for Biofuel Production

3.1 Cost-benefit analysis of pyrolysis plants

The cost-benefit analysis of pyrolysis plants involves evaluating the economic feasibility of converting industrial waste into biofuels. Pyrolysis technology has shown potential in transforming municipal solid waste (MSW) into valuable products such as bio-oil, syngas, and biochar. For instance, the pyrolysis of MSW can yield around 43% bio-oil, 27% biochar, and 25% syngas, making it a promising method for waste-to-energy conversion (Hasan et al., 2021). Additionally, the co-pyrolysis of waste oils and plastics can improve bio-oil yield and quality, further enhancing the economic viability of pyrolysis plants (Su et al., 2021).

3.2 Capital and operational expenditures

The capital expenditures (CAPEX) for pyrolysis plants include the costs of setting up the facility, purchasing equipment, and installing necessary infrastructure. Operational expenditures (OPEX) cover the costs of running the plant, including feedstock procurement, labor, maintenance, and energy consumption. The use of inexpensive catalysts, such as dolomite, in the pyrolysis process can reduce operational costs by enhancing the efficiency of the process (Veses et al., 2019). Moreover, the integration of advanced pyrolysis techniques, such as microwave heating, can lower energy consumption and operational costs (Mahari et al., 2021).

3.3 Market value of pyrolysis products (bio-oil, syngas, biochar)

The market value of pyrolysis products varies based on their quality and potential applications. Bio-oil, with its high calorific value, can be used as a liquid fuel or a source of chemical products (Trabelsi et al., 2018). Syngas, consisting mainly of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, can be utilized as a fuel or as a feedstock for producing other chemicals (Veses et al., 2019). Biochar, rich in organic carbon and nutrients, can be used as a soil amendment or a precursor for activated carbon (Ferrera-Lorenzo et al., 2014). The co-pyrolysis of different feedstocks can enhance the yield and quality of these products, increasing their market value (Zaafouri et al., 2016).

3.4 Comparative analysis with other waste-to-energy technologies

Compared to other waste-to-energy technologies, such as gasification and anaerobic digestion, pyrolysis offers several advantages. Pyrolysis can handle a wide range of feedstocks, including difficult biodegradable fractions and waste oils, and produce high-quality biofuels with lower energy consumption and process time (Giwa et al., 2019; Su et al., 2021). Additionally, pyrolysis generates fewer emissions and hazardous by-products, making it an environmentally friendly option (Hasan et al., 2021). The integration of pyrolysis with other processes, such as catalytic cracking, can further enhance its efficiency and product yield (Veses et al., 2019).

3.5 Financial viability and return on investment

The financial viability of pyrolysis projects depends on several factors, including feedstock availability, product market value, and operational efficiency. Studies have shown that the co-pyrolysis of waste materials can significantly improve biofuel yield and quality, leading to higher returns on investment (Zaafouri et al., 2016). The use of advanced pyrolysis techniques, such as microwave heating, can also enhance the financial viability of these projects by reducing operational costs and increasing product yield (Mahari et al., 2021). Overall, pyrolysis projects can offer attractive returns on investment, especially when integrated with other waste management and energy recovery processes (Yang et al., 2020).

3.6 Economic incentives and subsidies for pyrolysis projects

Governments and regulatory bodies often provide economic incentives and subsidies to promote the adoption of sustainable waste-to-energy technologies. These incentives can include tax credits, grants, and low-interest loans for setting up and operating pyrolysis plants. Additionally, policies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting renewable energy sources can further support the economic viability of pyrolysis projects (Hasan et al., 2021). The integration of pyrolysis with other waste management processes, such as anaerobic digestion, can also attract additional incentives and subsidies, enhancing the overall financial feasibility of these projects (Giwa et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2020).

4 Case Studies and Practical Applications

4.1 Review of successful pyrolysis projects globally

In Europe, the co-pyrolysis of biomass and waste plastics has been extensively studied and implemented to produce high-grade biofuels. This process not only addresses the issue of plastic waste management but also enhances the energy yield of the biofuels produced. The synergistic effects between biomass and plastics during co-pyrolysis result in higher yields of volatiles and improved quality of the bio-oil, making it a viable solution for energy security and waste management (Uzoejinwa et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2021; Vibhakar et al., 2022). In Asia, particularly in countries like China, the conversion of rubber waste through pyrolysis has shown promising results. The process involves the thermochemical conversion of rubber waste into valuable biofuels and chemicals. The use of advanced pyrolysis techniques, such as microwave heating, has been found to improve the efficiency and quality of the bio-oil produced. This method not only provides a sustainable way to manage rubber waste but also contributes to the production of high-quality biofuels (Mahari et al., 2021; Su et al., 2021). In North America, the pyrolysis of agricultural residues has been successfully implemented to produce biochar and bio-oil. The process parameters, such as temperature and reaction time, are optimized to maximize the yield of biochar, which is used for soil enhancement and carbon sequestration. The bio-oil produced is rich in phenolics and aromatic compounds, making it a valuable resource for the chemical industry. This approach not only addresses the issue of agricultural waste management but also contributes to environmental sustainability (Hasan et al., 2021; Patra et al., 2021).

4.2 Analysis of industrial-scale implementations

Industrial-scale implementations of pyrolysis technology face several operational challenges, including feedstock variability, reactor design, and process optimization. The variability in feedstock composition, particularly in municipal solid waste (MSW), can affect the consistency and quality of the bio-oil produced. Advanced sorting techniques and pre-treatment processes are recommended to ensure a consistent feedstock supply. Reactor design improvements, such as the use of rotary pyrolysis and fluidized bed reactors, enhance heat transfer and process efficiency. Additionally, the integration of emission control systems is crucial to minimize environmental impacts (Bach et al., 2019; Hasan et al., 2021; Mahari et al., 2021). The economic viability of industrial-scale pyrolysis projects depends on several factors, including feedstock availability, process efficiency, and market demand for biofuels and biochar. Successful projects have demonstrated that co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastics can significantly reduce operational costs and improve bio-oil yield and quality. The use of catalysts, such as CaO and Cu/HZSM-5, further enhances the quality of the bio-oil, making it competitive with fossil fuels. Moreover, the environmental benefits, such as reduced greenhouse gas emissions and effective waste management, contribute to the overall sustainability of the process (Uzoejinwa et al., 2018; Su et al., 2021).

4.3 Lessons learned from case studies

Key success factors for pyrolysis projects include the selection of appropriate feedstock combinations, optimization of process parameters, and the use of advanced reactor designs. The synergistic effects observed in co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastics highlight the importance of feedstock selection. Optimizing parameters such as temperature, heating rate, and biomass-to-plastic ratio is crucial for maximizing bio-oil yield and quality. Additionally, the adoption of advanced reactor designs, such as microwave and fluidized bed reactors, enhances process efficiency and product quality (Elkhalifa et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2021; Vibhakar et al., 2022). Common pitfalls in pyrolysis projects include feedstock variability, inadequate process control, and environmental concerns. To avoid these issues, it is essential to implement robust feedstock sorting and pre-treatment processes to ensure consistency. Continuous monitoring and control of process parameters are necessary to maintain optimal operating conditions. Addressing environmental concerns requires the integration of emission control systems and adherence to regulatory standards. By learning from these challenges, future pyrolysis projects can achieve greater success and sustainability (Bach et al., 2019; Mahari et al., 2021; Hasan et al., 2021).

5 Environmental Impact and Sustainability

5.1 Emission control and environmental benefits

Pyrolysis technology offers significant environmental benefits by reducing the emission of air pollutants compared to traditional waste disposal methods such as incineration and landfilling. The process converts hazardous waste materials, including plastics, tires, and medical waste, into useful products like gas, char, and pyrolysis oil, thereby minimizing soil and water pollution (Chew et al., 2021). Additionally, the use of waste oils in pyrolysis can produce high-grade biofuels with lower acid values when treated with specific catalysts, further reducing environmental hazards (Su et al., 2021). The rotary pyrolysis technique, in particular, has been highlighted for its efficiency in energy consumption and emission control, making it a viable option for municipal solid waste (MSW) management (Hasan et al., 2021).

5.2 Lifecycle assessment of pyrolysis processes

Lifecycle assessments (LCA) of pyrolysis processes indicate that they are more sustainable compared to conventional waste management methods. Pyrolysis not only reduces the volume of waste but also generates valuable by-products that can be used as alternative energy sources, thus contributing to a reduction in the carbon footprint (Sakthipriya, 2021). The co-pyrolysis of biomass and waste plastics has been shown to be more beneficial than biomass pyrolysis alone, offering a simple and effective solution to increase energy security and reduce dependency on fossil fuels (Uzoejinwa et al., 2018). Moreover, the application of pyrolysis in converting food waste to biochar has been found to be efficient, although more research is needed to optimize the process conditions (Elkhalifa et al., 2019).

5.3 Role in circular economy and waste reduction

Pyrolysis plays a crucial role in promoting a circular economy by converting waste materials into valuable products, thereby reducing the need for virgin resources. The process supports the recycling of plastics and other waste materials (Figure 2) (Islam et al., 2010), turning them into fuels and raw materials for new products, which aligns with the principles of a circular economy (Sakthipriya, 2021). The valorization of municipal wastes through co-pyrolysis not only produces green energy but also enhances energy security and environmental sustainability (Mahari et al., 2021). Furthermore, the pyrolysis of spent coffee grounds has been proposed as an eco-social innovation, providing economic, environmental, and social benefits while engaging consumers in the circular economy (Matrapazi and Zabaniotou, 2020).

5.4 Contribution to renewable energy targets

Pyrolysis technology significantly contributes to renewable energy targets by converting various types of waste into biofuels and other energy products. The process of waste biomass pyrolysis, for instance, allows for the production of second-generation biofuels, which are essential for reducing the carbon footprint and promoting sustainable energy sources (Igliński et al., 2023). The co-pyrolysis of biomass and waste plastics has been identified as a promising method to produce high-grade biofuels, thereby enhancing the renewable energy portfolio (Uzoejinwa et al., 2018). Additionally, the pyrolysis of MSW has been recognized for its potential to generate biofuel and other value-added products, making it an effective and eco-friendly technology for renewable energy production (Hasan et al., 2021).

6 Policy, Regulations, and Incentives

6.1 Overview of global and regional regulations on waste management and pyrolysis

Global and regional regulations on waste management and pyrolysis are crucial for the successful implementation and scaling of pyrolysis technology. Various countries have established frameworks to manage waste and promote sustainable practices. For instance, the European Union has stringent regulations on waste management, emphasizing the reduction, reuse, and recycling of waste materials. The Waste Framework Directive (2008/98/EC) sets the basic concepts and definitions related to waste management, including the principles of the waste hierarchy (Sakthipriya, 2021). Similarly, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has regulations under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) that govern the disposal of solid and hazardous waste (Hasan et al., 2021). These regulations are designed to protect human health and the environment from the potential hazards of waste disposal.

In Asia, countries like China have implemented policies to promote the use of pyrolysis for waste management. The Chinese government has introduced several regulations and incentives to encourage the adoption of pyrolysis technology for converting waste into energy, thereby addressing both waste management and energy security issues (Uzoejinwa et al., 2018). These regulations are part of broader efforts to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and mitigate environmental pollution.

6.2 Incentives for adopting pyrolysis technology

Governments and international organizations offer various incentives to promote the adoption of pyrolysis technology. These incentives include financial subsidies, tax breaks, and grants for research and development. For example, the European Union provides funding through programs like Horizon 2020 to support innovative waste management technologies, including pyrolysis (Sakthipriya, 2021). In the United States, the Department of Energy (DOE) offers grants and loans to projects that aim to develop and deploy advanced biofuel technologies, including those utilizing pyrolysis (Hasan et al., 2021).

In China, the government provides subsidies and tax incentives to companies that invest in pyrolysis technology for waste management and biofuel production. These incentives are part of the country's broader strategy to enhance energy security and reduce environmental pollution (Uzoejinwa et al., 2018). Additionally, international organizations such as the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) support projects that promote sustainable waste management practices, including the use of pyrolysis technology (Mahari et al., 2021).

6.3 Barriers to implementation and how to overcome them

Despite the potential benefits of pyrolysis technology, several barriers hinder its widespread adoption. One significant barrier is the high initial capital investment required for setting up pyrolysis plants. This includes the cost of advanced reactors, emission control systems, and other infrastructure (Hasan et al., 2021). To overcome this barrier, governments can provide financial support through subsidies, low-interest loans, and public-private partnerships.

Another barrier is the lack of awareness and technical expertise among stakeholders, including waste managers and policymakers. This can be addressed through educational programs, workshops, and training sessions that highlight the benefits and technical aspects of pyrolysis technology (Sakthipriya, 2021). Additionally, collaboration between academia, industry, and government can facilitate knowledge transfer and innovation in pyrolysis technology (Igliński et al., 2023).

Regulatory challenges also pose a barrier to the implementation of pyrolysis technology. Inconsistent regulations and standards across different regions can create uncertainty for investors and project developers. Harmonizing regulations and establishing clear guidelines for the operation and emissions of pyrolysis plants can help mitigate this issue (Su et al., 2022). Furthermore, continuous research and development are essential to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of pyrolysis technology, making it a more attractive option for waste management and biofuel production (Zaafouri et al., 2016; Su et al., 2021).

In conclusion, while there are several barriers to the implementation of pyrolysis technology, targeted policies, incentives, and collaborative efforts can help overcome these challenges and promote the sustainable management of industrial waste through pyrolysis.

7 Future Prospects and Research Directions

7.1 Emerging trends and technologies in pyrolysis

Recent advancements in pyrolysis technology have shown significant promise in enhancing the efficiency and output of biofuel production from industrial waste. One notable trend is the development of microwave pyrolysis, which offers more efficient heat transfer and reduced processing times compared to conventional methods. This technique has been particularly effective in the valorization of biomass waste, producing high-quality biochar and bio-oil with lower pollutant emissions (Foong et al., 2020; Ge et al., 2021). Additionally, co-pyrolysis, which involves the simultaneous pyrolysis of multiple feedstocks such as plastics and biomass, has emerged as a promising method to improve the yield and quality of biofuels. This approach leverages the synergistic effects between different materials to enhance the overall efficiency of the pyrolysis process (Uzoejinwa et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2021).

7.2 Potential for integration with other renewable energy systems

The integration of pyrolysis technology with other renewable energy systems presents a significant opportunity for creating more sustainable and efficient energy solutions. For instance, combining pyrolysis with solar energy can lead to entirely green processes, as solar-powered pyrolysis eliminates the need for external energy inputs, thereby reducing the carbon footprint (Foong et al., 2020). Furthermore, the integration of pyrolysis with biogas production systems can optimize waste management and energy recovery. The syngas produced from pyrolysis can be used to generate electricity or as a feedstock for further chemical synthesis, thereby creating a closed-loop system that maximizes resource utilization (Hasan et al., 2021; Mahari et al., 2021). Additionally, the biochar produced from pyrolysis can be used as a soil amendment to enhance carbon sequestration and improve soil health, further contributing to environmental sustainability (Igliński et al., 2023).

7.3 Research gaps and areas for further investigation

Despite the promising advancements in pyrolysis technology, several research gaps need to be addressed to fully realize its potential. One critical area is the optimization of reactor designs to improve heat distribution and material handling, particularly in continuous pyrolysis systems. Current designs often face challenges related to uneven heating and feedstock variability, which can impact the efficiency and consistency of biofuel production (Ge et al., 2021). Another area for further investigation is the development of advanced catalysts that can enhance the quality of bio-oil and reduce the formation of undesirable by-products. Research into bifunctional catalysts and co-catalysts, such as CaO and NaOH, has shown potential in improving bio-oil properties, but more work is needed to understand their mechanisms and optimize their use (Su et al., 2021). Additionally, there is a need for comprehensive techno-economic analyses to evaluate the feasibility and scalability of emerging pyrolysis technologies. Such studies will help identify the most cost-effective and sustainable approaches for industrial-scale applications (Yousef et al., 2019; Foong et al., 2020).

In conclusion, the future of pyrolysis technology in biofuel production from industrial waste looks promising, with several emerging trends and integration opportunities. However, addressing the existing research gaps through targeted investigations will be crucial for advancing the technology and achieving its full potential in sustainable energy production.

8 Concluding Remarks

The application of pyrolysis technology for the conversion of industrial waste into biofuels has shown significant promise across various studies. Key findings include the efficiency and yield improvements achieved through co-pyrolysis, particularly with microwave heating. This method has demonstrated higher efficiency and better yields of bio-oil compared to conventional pyrolysis methods due to improved heat transfer and reduced oxygen content in the resultant bio-oil. Feedstock versatility is another notable advantage. Various types of waste, including municipal solid waste (MSW), waste plastics, waste oils, and biomass, have been successfully utilized as feedstocks for pyrolysis, each contributing to the production of high-quality biofuels. The use of catalysts, such as CaO and NaOH, has been shown to significantly improve the quality of bio-oil by reducing its acid value and enhancing its calorific value. Environmental benefits of pyrolysis include providing a renewable source of energy and addressing waste management issues, thereby contributing to environmental sustainability.

The findings from these studies have several implications for industry and policymakers. Regarding energy security, the adoption of pyrolysis technology can enhance energy security by providing an alternative to fossil fuels and reducing dependency on non-renewable energy sources. In terms of waste management, pyrolysis offers a viable solution for managing industrial and municipal waste, converting it into valuable energy products and reducing landfill use. The economic viability of pyrolysis processes is promising. Economic analyses indicate that with the right technological advancements and policy support, pyrolysis can be a cost-effective method for biofuel production. For regulatory support, policymakers should consider providing incentives for the development and adoption of pyrolysis technology. This includes subsidies for research and development, as well as regulations that promote the use of renewable energy sources.

The future of pyrolysis technology in biofuel production looks promising, with ongoing research and technological advancements continually improving its efficiency and economic viability. Key areas for future development include technological innovations, where continued innovation in reactor design and the development of more efficient catalysts will further enhance the yield and quality of biofuels produced through pyrolysis. Another important area is the integration with other technologies. Combining pyrolysis with other renewable energy technologies, such as solar or wind power, could further reduce the carbon footprint and improve the overall sustainability of biofuel production. Policy and market development are also crucial. Stronger policy frameworks and market incentives will be essential in driving the adoption of pyrolysis technology on a larger scale, ensuring that it becomes a mainstream method for biofuel production. In conclusion, pyrolysis technology holds significant potential for transforming industrial waste into valuable biofuels, contributing to energy security, environmental sustainability, and economic growth. With continued research, technological advancements, and supportive policies, pyrolysis could play a pivotal role in the future of renewable energy.

Acknowledgments

The author extends sincere thanks to two anonymous peer reviewers for their invaluable feedback on the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The author affirms that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Reference

Adelawon B., Latinwo G., Eboibi B., Agbede O., and Agarry S., 2021, Comparison of the slow, fast, and flash pyrolysis of recycled maize-cob biomass waste, box-benhken process optimization and characterization studies for the thermal fast pyrolysis production of bio-energy, Chemical Engineering Communications, 209: 1246-1276.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2021.1957851

Ahmed H., Altalhi A., Elbanna S., El-saied H., Farag A., Negm N., and Mohamed E., 2022, Effect of reaction parameters on catalytic pyrolysis of waste cooking oil for production of sustainable biodiesel and biojet by functionalized montmorillonite/chitosan nanocomposites, ACS Omega, 7: 4585-4594.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c06518

Alcazar‐Ruiz A., Dorado F., and Sánchez-Silva L., 2021, Fast pyrolysis of agroindustrial wastes blends: Hydrocarbon production enhancement, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105242

Bach Q., Chen W., Eng C., Wang C., Liang K., and Kuo J., 2019, Pyrolysis characteristics and non-isothermal torrefaction kinetics of industrial solid wastes, Fuel.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2019.04.024

Chew K., Chia S., Chia W., Cheah W., Munawaroh H., and Ong W., 2021, Abatement of hazardous materials and biomass waste via pyrolysis and co-pyrolysis for environmental sustainability and circular economy, Environmental pollution, 278: 116836.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116836

Elkhalifa S., Al-Ansari T., Mackey H., and Mckay G., 2019, Food waste to biochars through pyrolysis: A review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2019.01.024

Ferrera-Lorenzo N., Fuente E., Bermúdez J., Suárez‐Ruiz I., and Ruiz B., 2014, Conventional and microwave pyrolysis of a macroalgae waste from the Agar-Agar industry, Prospects for bio-fuel production, Bioresource technology, 151: 199-206.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.047

Foong S., Liew R., Yang Y., Cheng Y., Yek P., Mahari W., Lee X., Han C., Vo D., Le Q., Aghbashlo M., Tabatabaei M., Sonne C., Peng W., and Lam S., 2020, Valorization of biomass waste to engineered activated biochar by microwave pyrolysis: Progress, challenges, and future directions, Chemical Engineering Journal, 389: 124401.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124401

Ge S., Yek P., Cheng Y., Xia C., Mahari W., Liew R., Peng W., Yuan T., Tabatabaei M., Aghbashlo M., Sonne C., and Lam S., 2021, Progress in microwave pyrolysis conversion of agricultural waste to value-added biofuels: A batch to continuous approach, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135: 110148.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110148

Giwa A., Chang F., Xu H., Zhang X., Huang B., Li Y., Wu J., Wang B., Vakili M., and Wang K., 2019, Pyrolysis of difficult biodegradable fractions and the real syngas bio-methanation performance, Journal of Cleaner Production.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.06.145

Hasan M., Rasul M., Khan M., Ashwath N., and Jahirul M., 2021, Energy recovery from municipal solid waste using pyrolysis technology: A review on current status and developments, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2021.111073

Igliński B., Kujawski W., and Kiełkowska U., 2023, Pyrolysis of Waste Biomass: Technical and Process Achievements, and Future Development—A Review, Energies.

https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041829

Islam M. R., Parveen M., Haniu H., and Sarker M.I., 2010, Innovation in pyrolysis technology for management of scrap tire: a solution of energy and environment, International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 1(1): 89.

Kabir M., Chowdhury A., and Rasul M., 2015, Pyrolysis of municipal green waste: a modelling, simulation and experimental analysis, Energies, 8: 7522-7541.

https://doi.org/10.3390/EN8087522

Kasar P., Sharma D., and Ahmaruzzaman M., 2020, Thermal and catalytic decomposition of waste plastics and its co-processing with petroleum residue through pyrolysis process, Journal of Cleaner Production, 265: 121639.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121639

Kim S., Lee Y., Lin K., Hong E., Kwon E., and Lee J., 2020, The valorization of food waste via pyrolysis, Journal of Cleaner Production, 259: 120816.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120816

Mahari W., Azwar E., Foong S., Ahmed A., Peng W., Tabatabaei M., Aghbashlo M., Park Y., Sonne C., and Lam S., 2021, Valorization of municipal wastes using co-pyrolysis for green energy production, energy security, and environmental sustainability: A review, Chemical Engineering Journal, 129749.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2021.129749

Matrapazi V., and Zabaniotou A., 2020, Experimental and feasibility study of spent coffee grounds upscaling via pyrolysis towards proposing an eco-social innovation circular economy solution, The Science of the total environment, 718: 137316.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137316

Patra B., Nanda S., Dalai A., and Meda V., 2021, Slow pyrolysis of agro-food wastes and physicochemical characterization of biofuel products, Chemosphere, 285: 131431.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131431

Sakthipriya N., 2021, Plastic waste management: A road map to achieve circular economy and recent innovations in pyrolysis, The Science of the total environment, 151160.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151160

Singh E., Kumar A., Mishra R., You S., Singh L., Kumar S., and Kumar R., 2020, Pyrolysis of waste biomass and plastics for production of biochar and its use for removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution, Bioresource technology, 320(Pt A): 124278.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124278

Su G., Ong H.C., Fattah I.R., Ok Y.S., Jang J.H., and Wang C.T., 2022, State-of-the-art of the pyrolysis and co-pyrolysis of food waste: Progress and challenges, Science of The Total Environment, 809: 151170.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151170

Su G., Ong H.C., Gan Y.Y., Chen W.H., Chong C.T., and Ok Y.S., 2022, Co-pyrolysis of microalgae and other biomass wastes for the production of high-quality bio-oil: Progress and prospective, Bioresource technology, 344: 126096.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126096

Thangalazhy‐Gopakumar S., and Adhikari S., 2016, Fast pyrolysis of agricultural wastes for bio-fuel and bio-char, 301-332.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0150-5_11

Trabelsi A., Zaafouri K., Baghdadi W., Naoui S., and Ouerghi A., 2018, Second generation biofuels production from waste cooking oil via pyrolysis process, Renewable Energy.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2018.04.002

Uzoejinwa B., He X., Wang S., Abomohra A., Hu Y., and Wang Q., 2018, Co-pyrolysis of biomass and waste plastics as a thermochemical conversion technology for high-grade biofuel production: Recent progress and future directions elsewhere worldwide, Energy Conversion and Management, 163: 468-492.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2018.02.004

Veses A., Sanahuja-Parejo O., Callén M., Murillo R., and García T., 2019, A combined two-stage process of pyrolysis and catalytic cracking of municipal solid waste for the production of syngas and solid refuse-derived fuels, Waste management, 101: 171-179.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.009

Vibhakar C., Sabeenian R., Kaliappan S., Patil P., Patil P., Madhu P., Dhanalakshmi C., and Birhanu H., 2022, Production and optimization of energy rich biofuel through co-pyrolysis by utilizing mixed agricultural residues and mixed waste plastics, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8175552

Wang Z., Burra K., Lei T., and Gupta A., 2021, Co-pyrolysis of waste plastic and solid biomass for synergistic production of biofuels and chemicals-A review, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 84: 100899.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100899

Yang Z., Liu Y., Zhang J., Kaiwei M., Kurbonova M., Liu G., Zhang R., Zhang R., and Wang W., 2020, Improvement of biofuel recovery from food waste by integration of anaerobic digestion, digestate pyrolysis and syngas biomethanation under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions, Journal of Cleaner Production, 256: 120594.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120594

Yousef S., Eimontas J., Striūgas N., Tatariants M., Abdelnaby M., Tučkutė S., and Kliucininkas L., 2019, A sustainable bioenergy conversion strategy for textile waste with self-catalysts using mini-pyrolysis plant, Energy Conversion and Management.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2019.06.050

Zaafouri K., Trabelsi A., Krichah S., Ouerghi A., Aydi A., Claumann C., Wüst Z., Naoui S., Bergaoui L., and Hamdi M., 2016, Enhancement of biofuels production by means of co-pyrolysis of Posidonia oceanica (L.) and frying oil wastes: Experimental study and process modeling, Bioresource technology, 207: 387-398.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.004