1 Introduction

Biodiesel production has gained significant attention in recent years as an alternative to fossil fuels due to its potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reliance on non-renewable energy sources. Biodiesel is a renewable, biodegradable, and non-toxic fuel that can be produced from various feedstocks, including vegetable oils, animal fats, and algae. The global energy crisis, coupled with the environmental impacts of fossil fuels, has driven research and development in sustainable biofuel alternatives, with biodiesel emerging as a promising solution (Mallick et al., 2016). The production of biodiesel from microalgae, in particular, has shown great potential due to its high lipid content and ability to grow in diverse environments, including non-arable land and wastewater (Huang et al., 2018).

Marine microalgae have emerged as a highly promising feedstock for biodiesel production due to several advantageous characteristics. They possess a high growth rate, significant lipid accumulation, and the ability to grow in saline water, which reduces the competition with agricultural crops for freshwater resources (Atmanli, 2020). Marine microalgae can also utilize CO₂ from industrial emissions, thus contributing to carbon sequestration and reducing greenhouse gas emissions (Dickinson et al., 2017). Furthermore, the cultivation of marine microalgae does not require arable land, making it a sustainable option for large-scale biodiesel production (Dharani et al., 2020).

The primary objective of this research is to optimize the application and cultivation of marine microalgae for biodiesel production. This involves identifying the most suitable marine microalgae species, optimizing their growth conditions, and developing cost-effective harvesting and lipid extraction techniques. The research aims to address the technical and economic challenges associated with large-scale biodiesel production from marine microalgae, including strain selection, biomass productivity, lipid content, and downstream processing (Branco-Vieira et al., 2020). By integrating advances in biotechnology and engineering, the research seeks to enhance the feasibility and sustainability of marine microalgae as a biodiesel feedstock, ultimately contributing to the development of a viable alternative energy source (Sabu et al., 2017).

2 Marine Microalgae Species for Biodiesel Production

2.1 Selection criteria for marine microalgae species

Selecting appropriate marine microalgae species for biodiesel production involves evaluating several critical factors. One of the primary criteria is the lipid content and quality of the microalgae. High lipid content, particularly in the form of triacylglycerols (TAGs), is essential because these lipids can be efficiently converted into biodiesel. Moreover, the fatty acid composition is crucial as it affects the biodiesel's properties, such as cetane number and cold flow performance (Arroussi et al., 2017).

Another important factor is the growth rate of the microalgae. Species that grow rapidly can produce more biomass in a shorter time, thereby increasing the overall yield of biodiesel. This is particularly important for large-scale production where efficiency and speed are crucial (Taleb et al., 2016).

The resilience of the microalgae to environmental conditions is also a key consideration. Species that can withstand variations in temperature, salinity, and light intensity are preferred, as they can be cultivated in diverse environments, including those with non-arable land and saline water. This flexibility reduces competition with agricultural crops for resources (Nwokoagbara et al., 2015).

2.2 High-yield lipid-producing microalgae species

Several marine microalgae species have been identified as high-yield lipid producers suitable for biodiesel production. Nannochloropsis gaditana is one such species, known for its high lipid content and robustness in various cultivation conditions. Studies have shown that it can achieve significant lipid productivity, making it a prime candidate for biodiesel production (Arroussi et al., 2017).

Another promising species is Chlorella vulgaris, which not only has a high lipid content but also a favorable fatty acid profile for biodiesel. This species is widely studied and has demonstrated consistent performance in biodiesel production trials (Shanmugam et al., 2020).

Isochrysis galbana and Dunaliella tertiolecta are also notable for their high lipid yields and adaptability to different environmental conditions. These species have been shown to produce high-quality biodiesel with suitable properties for commercial use (Atmanli, 2020).

2.3 Genetic and metabolic traits influencing biodiesel suitability

The genetic and metabolic traits of marine microalgae play a significant role in determining their suitability for biodiesel production. Genetic engineering and metabolic optimization can enhance lipid accumulation and improve the efficiency of biodiesel production processes. For instance, certain genetic modifications can increase the synthesis of TAGs, thereby boosting the lipid content of the microalgae (Sabu et al., 2017).

Metabolic pathways that favor the production of saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids are particularly beneficial for biodiesel quality. These fatty acids improve the cetane number and oxidative stability of the biodiesel, making it more efficient and durable as a fuel source. Strains that naturally exhibit these traits or can be engineered to do so are highly valuable in biodiesel production (Deshmukh et al., 2019).

Additionally, traits such as high growth rate, resilience to environmental stress, and ease of harvesting are crucial for large-scale production. Species that can maintain high lipid productivity under varying conditions are preferred as they ensure consistent output and lower production costs (Wen et al., 2016).

3 Cultivation Conditions and Optimization

3.1 Nutrient requirements and management

Nutrient management is critical for the optimal growth of marine microalgae used in biodiesel production. Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are particularly important macronutrients. The appropriate balance of these nutrients can significantly influence algal biomass productivity and lipid content. Studies have shown that effluents from anaerobic digestion, which are rich in nitrogen and phosphorus, can be effectively used to cultivate marine microalgae like Nannochloropsis sp., achieving up to 50% lipid content under nitrogen stress conditions (Mayers et al., 2017).

Phosphorus is another crucial nutrient, and its availability can affect nitrogen assimilation and overall growth. Efficient phosphorus management can enhance biomass production and lipid accumulation. The recycling of nutrients from various waste sources, such as municipal wastewater or biogas slurry, has also been explored to provide a sustainable nutrient supply for microalgae cultivation (Yaakob et al., 2021).

Silica is essential for the growth of diatoms, a type of microalgae with silica-based cell walls. Its availability can influence the growth and development of these species, which are also considered for biodiesel production due to their high lipid content (Zhuang et al., 2018).

3.2 Light intensity, photoperiod, and wavelength effects on growth

Light is a fundamental factor influencing the growth and lipid accumulation in microalgae. The intensity, photoperiod, and wavelength of light all play crucial roles in optimizing photosynthetic efficiency. Higher light intensities generally enhance growth rates, but excessive light can lead to photoinhibition. Therefore, optimizing light intensity is essential for maximizing biomass yield without causing damage to the cells (Molina-Miras et al., 2022).

The photoperiod, or the duration of light exposure, also impacts microalgae growth. A balanced light-dark cycle can enhance growth and lipid production. For instance, a 16:8 light-dark cycle has been shown to be effective for many microalgal species, promoting efficient photosynthesis during the light phase and allowing for cellular maintenance and repair during the dark phase (Atmanli, 2020).

Different wavelengths of light can also affect the growth and biochemical composition of microalgae. Blue and red light are particularly effective for photosynthesis, as they are absorbed by chlorophylls and other pigments, driving the growth and lipid accumulation in microalgae (Mayers et al., 2017).

3.3 Temperature and salinity optimization for maximal lipid accumulation

Temperature and salinity are environmental factors that significantly influence the growth and lipid production of marine microalgae. Optimal temperature ranges for most microalgae species are between 20 ℃ and 30 ℃. Within this range, microalgae exhibit maximal growth and lipid accumulation. Deviations from the optimal temperature can lead to reduced growth rates and lipid content (Zhou et al., 2018).

Salinity also plays a crucial role in the cultivation of marine microalgae. Species adapted to high salinity environments can utilize seawater, reducing the need for freshwater resources. Proper salinity levels must be maintained to prevent osmotic stress, which can adversely affect cell physiology and lipid production (Kim et al., 2017).

3.4 Carbon dioxide utilization and optimization techniques

Carbon dioxide (CO₂) is a critical component of microalgae cultivation, as it is a carbon source for photosynthesis. Optimizing CO₂ concentration can enhance biomass production and lipid accumulation. High CO₂ levels, up to 5%-10%, can significantly increase growth rates and lipid content in microalgae (Ge and Champagne, 2017).

Several techniques have been developed to optimize CO₂ utilization in microalgal cultures. These include the use of gas spargers to ensure efficient CO₂ distribution in photobioreactors and the integration of CO₂ capture systems from industrial emissions. These methods not only enhance microalgal growth but also contribute to reducing carbon emissions, making the process more sustainable (Peng et al., 2020a).

4 Harvesting and Extraction Techniques

4.1 Efficient harvesting methods (flocculation, centrifugation, filtration)

Efficient harvesting of marine microalgae is crucial for the economic viability of biodiesel production. Various methods are used to harvest microalgae, each with its own advantages and challenges. Flocculation involves the aggregation of microalgal cells into larger particles that can be easily separated from the water. This can be achieved using chemical flocculants such as cationic cellulose nanocrystals, which have shown high efficiency at low doses (Verfaillie et al., 2020). Bio-flocculation, using other microalgae like Tetraselmis suecica as flocculant agents, is an environmentally friendly method that has been demonstrated to improve harvesting efficiency significantly (Kawaroe et al., 2016).

Centrifugation is a widely used technique due to its high efficiency in separating microalgal biomass from the culture medium. However, it is energy-intensive and thus costly. Recent innovations include the use of non-sacrificial carbon electrodes for electrochemical harvesting, which has shown promising results with lower energy consumption compared to traditional centrifugation (Guldhe et al., 2016).

Filtration methods, such as microfiltration and ultrafiltration, are also used, often in combination with flocculation to enhance efficiency. Innovations in membrane technology, like patterned membranes combined with flocculation, have shown to reduce fouling and increase permeance, making them more cost-effective and scalable (Zhao et al., 2021).

4.2 Lipid extraction processes

Solvent Extraction is the traditional method for lipid extraction from microalgae. It involves the use of organic solvents such as hexane, methanol, and chloroform. While effective, these solvents are often toxic and require subsequent purification steps to remove residual solvents from the extracted lipids. Innovations include the use of less toxic solvents and co-solvents to enhance extraction efficiency and reduce environmental impact (Paudel et al., 2015).

Supercritical CO₂ Extraction (SFE) is a green technology that uses supercritical carbon dioxide to extract lipids from microalgae. This method is advantageous because it is non-toxic, leaves no solvent residues, and operates at relatively low temperatures, preserving the quality of the extracted lipids. Studies have shown that the addition of co-solvents like ethanol can enhance the extraction efficiency of supercritical CO₂, making it a highly effective method for lipid extraction (Patil et al., 2018).

4.3 Comparison of extraction efficiencies and impacts on biodiesel quality

Comparative studies between different extraction methods reveal significant differences in efficiency and the quality of the extracted lipids. Solvent Extraction typically achieves high lipid yields but may compromise lipid quality due to the potential presence of residual solvents and the need for high-temperature drying processes. This method is cost-effective but less environmentally friendly.

Supercritical CO₂ Extraction offers a cleaner alternative with high extraction efficiency and superior lipid quality. The use of supercritical CO₂ ensures that the lipids are free from solvent residues, resulting in high-purity biodiesel. The method's scalability and environmental benefits make it increasingly attractive for commercial applications (Tzima et al., 2023). Overall, while solvent extraction remains a widely used method due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness, supercritical CO₂ extraction is emerging as a superior technique in terms of both environmental impact and biodiesel quality.

5 Bioreactor Design and Scale-Up

5.1 Types of bioreactors

Open pond systems, such as raceway ponds, are one of the most common methods for cultivating microalgae. These systems are typically shallow and use paddle wheels to circulate the water, ensuring even distribution of nutrients and exposure to sunlight. Open ponds are cost-effective and easy to construct, making them a popular choice for large-scale microalgae cultivation (Narala et al., 2016).

Closed photobioreactors (PBRs) provide a controlled environment for microalgae growth, which can lead to higher productivity and better-quality biomass. Types of closed PBRs include tubular, flat plate, and column bioreactors. These systems protect the culture from contamination and allow precise control over growth conditions such as light, temperature, pH, and nutrient supply (Gupta et al., 2015).

5.2 Advantages and limitations of each bioreactor type

Low capital and operational costs, simple design, and ease of scalability. Suitable for large-scale biomass production. Limited control over environmental conditions, high risk of contamination, significant water loss through evaporation, and lower biomass productivity compared to closed systems (Singha et al., 2017).

Better control over cultivation conditions, reduced contamination risk, higher biomass productivity, and efficient use of CO₂ and nutrients. Suitable for producing high-value products such as pharmaceuticals and nutraceuticals. Higher capital and operational costs, more complex design and maintenance, and challenges in scaling up for large-scale production (Solimeno et al., 2017).

5.3 Scale-up challenges and solutions for commercial production

Scaling up microalgae cultivation systems from laboratory to commercial scale involves several challenges. The high cost of photobioreactors and the associated infrastructure can be prohibitive. Solutions include optimizing the design and operation of bioreactors to reduce costs and developing hybrid systems that combine the advantages of both open ponds and closed PBRs (Sun, 2023). Open pond systems are highly susceptible to contamination from other microorganisms. Closed systems reduce this risk but are more expensive. Implementing semi-closed systems and using genetic engineering to create resistant algal strains can mitigate contamination issues (Loera-Quezada et al., 2016) (Figure 1).

Maintaining optimal conditions (e.g., light, temperature, pH) is more challenging at larger scales. Advances in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and real-time monitoring systems can help optimize environmental conditions and improve productivity (Hinterholz et al., 2019). Efficient nutrient and CO₂ supply systems are essential for large-scale cultivation. Integrating waste streams, such as flue gases and wastewater, can provide a sustainable source of nutrients and CO₂, reducing operational costs and environmental impact (Díez-Montero et al., 2020). Energy Consumption: High energy consumption for mixing, aeration, and temperature control can affect the economic viability of microalgae cultivation. Energy-efficient designs and renewable energy sources can help reduce the overall energy footprint (Kwon and Yeom, 2017).

Figure 1 shows the growth of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii transgenic lines using phosphite as a phosphorus source. Panel (a) displays the positive PTXD transgenic lines (CrB-1, CrP-6, CrP-13, CrX-3, CrX-9) grown in Tris-Acetate (TA) media that either lacked phosphorus (-P) or was supplemented with 0.1 mM phosphate (Pi) or phosphite (Phi). Panels (b) and (c) illustrate the optical density (OD) at 680 nm over 6 days for P-starved and P-replete cells, respectively, with 0.1 mM phosphite as the phosphorus source. The experiments were conducted using a photobioreactor (Multi-Cultivator MC 1000) with a light intensity of 250 μmol photons/m²/s, at 28 ℃, and bubbled with air. The wild-type C. reinhardtii CC-125 (CrWT) strain served as the control. The results indicate that the transgenic lines show significant growth advantages under phosphite conditions.

6 Case Study: Commercial Application of Nannochloropsis for Biodiesel Production

6.1 Overview of nannochloropsis species characteristics

Nannochloropsis is a genus of marine microalgae known for its high lipid content and robust growth characteristics, making it a promising candidate for biodiesel production. Nannochloropsis species, such as N. gaditana, N. oculata, and N. salina, are particularly valued for their ability to accumulate large amounts of neutral lipids, which are ideal for biodiesel conversion.

These microalgae thrive in various environmental conditions, demonstrating resilience to varying temperatures, salinity, and light intensities (Qunju et al., 2016). They also produce valuable co-products like polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), which can be used in nutraceuticals (He et al., 2019).

6.2 Cultivation strategies employed in commercial settings

In commercial settings, Nannochloropsis is cultivated using both open pond systems and closed photobioreactors. Open raceway ponds are cost-effective and suitable for large-scale biomass production. These systems typically involve shallow ponds with paddle wheels to circulate the culture and ensure even light distribution and nutrient availability. For instance, in a study conducted in Egypt, Nannochloropsis sp. was successfully grown in 200-L raceway ponds, achieving significant biomass productivity (Mohammady et al., 2020).

Closed photobioreactors, on the other hand, offer better control over environmental parameters and reduce the risk of contamination. These systems can be optimized for higher productivity by controlling factors such as light intensity, photoperiod, temperature, and nutrient supply. In some studies, photobioreactors have demonstrated superior performance in terms of biomass and lipid productivity (Peng et al., 2020b).

6.3 Harvesting, lipid extraction, and biodiesel conversion processes

Efficient harvesting methods such as flocculation, centrifugation, and filtration are used to separate the microalgal biomass from the culture medium. Flocculation, using agents like cationic cellulose nanocrystals, can aggregate microalgal cells for easier separation (Verfaillie et al., 2020).

Lipid extraction from Nannochloropsis biomass is typically performed using solvent extraction or supercritical CO₂ extraction. Solvent extraction with hexane and ethanol is common but can be environmentally harmful. Supercritical CO₂ extraction, although more costly, provides a cleaner and more efficient method for extracting high-quality lipids (Taher et al., 2020). The extracted lipids are converted into biodiesel through transesterification. Enzymatic transesterification, using immobilized lipases, has been shown to be effective and environmentally friendly, producing high yields of biodiesel with good fuel properties (He et al., 2020).

6.4 Economic analysis and sustainability assessment

The economic feasibility of Nannochloropsis-based biodiesel production is influenced by factors such as biomass productivity, lipid content, and processing costs. A study assessing commercial-scale production in Egypt found a return on investment (ROI) of 22%, indicating potential profitability when high-value co-products are considered alongside biodiesel (Mohammady et al., 2020).

Sustainability is another critical aspect. Using CO₂ from industrial emissions for microalgae cultivation can mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Integrating wastewater treatment with microalgae cultivation can also provide a sustainable nutrient source, reducing the overall environmental footprint (Mitra and Mishra, 2019). Additionally, the use of renewable energy sources for powering cultivation and processing systems can further enhance the sustainability of the production process (He et al., 2019).

7 Integration with Wastewater Treatment

7.1 Utilization of marine microalgae in nutrient-rich wastewater

Marine microalgae have shown significant potential in the treatment of nutrient-rich wastewater due to their ability to assimilate nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus, which are essential for their growth. This process not only helps in wastewater treatment but also supports the production of valuable biomass. Studies have demonstrated that microalgae can effectively remove high concentrations of nutrients from various types of wastewater, including industrial, agricultural, and aquaculture effluents. For instance, a study by Gupta et al. (2019) highlighted the use of microalgae in treating nutrient-rich wastewater from agro-based industries, achieving substantial removal rates for nitrogen and phosphorus while simultaneously producing biomass that can be used for bioenergy.

Microalgae such as Chlorella vulgaris and Nannochloropsis sp. have been particularly effective in nutrient uptake. These microalgae can thrive in wastewater environments, utilizing the available nutrients for growth and thereby reducing the pollutant load. The integration of microalgae cultivation with wastewater treatment processes, such as in a biofilm membrane photobioreactor (BF-MPBR), has been shown to enhance nutrient removal efficiency. Peng et al. (2020b) demonstrated that this system could achieve removal rates of up to 99.6% for dissolved inorganic nitrogen and 98.4% for dissolved inorganic phosphorus, highlighting the effectiveness of microalgae in wastewater bioremediation.

7.2 Dual benefits: wastewater treatment and biomass production

The integration of microalgae cultivation with wastewater treatment offers dual benefits: efficient wastewater treatment and the production of valuable biomass. Microalgae-based systems can convert wastewater pollutants into biomass, which can be further processed into biofuels, fertilizers, and other high-value products. This approach not only addresses environmental pollution but also contributes to the circular bioeconomy by transforming waste into resources.

The dual role of microalgae in wastewater treatment and biomass production is exemplified in the study by Chai et al. (2020), which reviewed the multifaceted roles of microalgae in biotreatment systems. The study emphasized that microalgae can effectively remove nutrients and other contaminants from wastewater while producing biomass with significant lipid and carbohydrate content. This biomass can be utilized for biodiesel production, thereby providing a sustainable energy source.

In another example, Hernández-García et al. (2019) investigated the use of microalgae-bacteria consortia for the treatment of wastewater and landfill leachate. The study found that these consortia could achieve high nutrient removal efficiencies while producing biomass with a high content of lipids and carbohydrates, suitable for biofuel production. The integration of microalgae cultivation with wastewater treatment not only improves water quality but also supports the generation of renewable energy resources.

7.3 Case examples of integrated systems and their efficiencies

Several case studies have demonstrated the efficiency and feasibility of integrating microalgae cultivation with wastewater treatment systems. These systems utilize the symbiotic relationship between microalgae and bacteria to enhance nutrient removal from wastewater. For example, an integrated system using Scenedesmus sp. in a tertiary treatment setup achieved complete removal of ammonium and phosphate, along with significant reductions in nitrates and organic matter. The system also produced high-quality biomass suitable for biogas production (Arias et al., 2018).

Using microalgae like Tetraselmis suecica and Scenedesmus quadricauda for the treatment of dairy wastewater has shown high removal efficiencies for nitrogen, phosphate, and organic carbon. The produced biomass had a high lipid content, making it suitable for biodiesel production. This approach highlights the versatility of microalgae in treating various types of wastewater while generating valuable biomass (Daneshvar et al., 2018) (Figure 2).

Microalgae cultivation using palm oil mill effluent (POME) has been studied for its effectiveness in nutrient removal and biomass production. The integration of POME with microalgae cultivation systems has shown significant reductions in nutrient concentrations and organic matter, making it an efficient method for wastewater treatment and biofuel production (Cheah et al., 2016).

Figure 2 illustrates the effect of tetracycline (TC) concentration and contact time on the efficiency of TC removal from water by microalgal biomass. The results indicate that: In panel (a), as the initial TC concentration increases, the removal efficiency rapidly increases at low concentrations and then stabilizes, while the biosorption capacity gradually increases at higher concentrations. In panel (b), with increased contact time, the removal efficiency steadily improves and eventually stabilizes. These findings suggest that TC removal efficiency is significantly influenced by initial concentration and contact time, demonstrating that microalgal biomass has the potential to effectively remove TC under appropriate conditions.

8 Economic and Environmental Impact Assessment

8.1 Cost analysis of marine microalgae cultivation and biodiesel production

The economic feasibility of producing biodiesel from marine microalgae hinges on several cost factors, including cultivation, harvesting, lipid extraction, and biodiesel conversion. Studies show that the production cost for microalgae biomass is approximately €2.01 per kg, while the cost of biodiesel production is around €0.33 per liter (Branco-Vieira et al., 2020). This relatively high cost is a significant barrier to the commercial viability of microalgae-based biodiesel, particularly when compared to fossil fuels and other biofuel feedstocks. Key cost drivers include the energy-intensive processes of cultivation and harvesting, as well as the costs associated with maintaining optimal growth conditions for the microalgae.

Additionally, the infrastructure required for large-scale production, such as photobioreactors and raceway ponds, represents a substantial capital investment. Despite these challenges, the return on investment (ROI) for such projects has been estimated at around 10%, with a payback period of 10 years, indicating potential long-term profitability. To improve economic feasibility, strategies such as optimizing production processes, reducing energy consumption, and integrating co-product valorization (such as extracting high-value compounds alongside biodiesel) are essential. Technological advancements and economies of scale may also help lower costs over time, making microalgae-based biodiesel a more competitive alternative to traditional fuels (Branco-Vieira et al., 2020).

8.2 Life cycle assessment (LCA) of marine microalgae-based biodiesel

Life cycle assessment (lca) provides a comprehensive evaluation of the environmental impacts associated with the production of biodiesel from marine microalgae. This approach considers the entire production chain, from microalgae cultivation to biodiesel conversion and use. According to Shimako et al. (2016), the production of biodiesel from microalgae involves several energy-intensive steps, particularly supercritical CO₂ extraction and drying, which significantly contribute to the overall environmental footprint. The LCA results indicate that these processes are major contributors to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy consumption, highlighting the need for technological improvements to enhance energy efficiency.

The study also reveals that integrating microalgae cultivation with biogas systems can improve the environmental performance by utilizing waste biomass for energy production, thereby reducing the reliance on external energy sources and lowering GHG emissions. Furthermore, the dynamic LCA for climate change shows that energy consumption in the production steps is the primary factor affecting human health and ecosystem quality due to the associated GHG emissions. These findings underscore the importance of optimizing production processes and exploring renewable energy options to minimize the environmental impacts of microalgae-based biodiesel (Shimako et al., 2016).

8.3 Comparative analysis with conventional biodiesel feedstocks

When comparing microalgae-based biodiesel to conventional biodiesel feedstocks such as soybeans and palm oil, several advantages and challenges emerge. Microalgae offer higher lipid content and faster growth rates, making them a potentially more efficient source of biodiesel. Unlike terrestrial crops, microalgae can be cultivated in saline water and on non-arable land, thus avoiding competition with food crops and reducing the strain on freshwater resources. According to Dickinson et al. (2017), microalgae-based biodiesel requires less land and can achieve higher productivity compared to conventional feedstocks (Figure 3).

However, the production process for microalgae biodiesel is more energy and cost-intensive. The cultivation, harvesting, and lipid extraction processes for microalgae require substantial energy inputs, which can offset some of the environmental benefits. Additionally, the infrastructure and technology needed for large-scale microalgae cultivation and processing are still more expensive compared to traditional agricultural practices. Despite these challenges, ongoing research and technological advancements aim to improve the efficiency and reduce the costs associated with microalgae biodiesel production, making it a more viable and sustainable alternative in the future (Dickinson et al., 2017).

Figure 3 illustrates the best production path determined by Ríos et al. (2013). The diagram details the steps from microalgae cultivation to biodiesel production. Microalgae are cultivated in an open pond (OP) system, receiving CO₂ and nutrients. The cultivated microalgae undergo dynamic cross-flow filtration and centrifugation to obtain high-concentration biomass (BMII wet and dry). The dried biomass is processed through "Dry route B" direct esterification, using chloroform, sulfuric acid, and methanol. The esterified product undergoes alkali transesterification using KOH, with methanol being recycled. The final product is purified to obtain biodiesel (BD3 and 6), with glycerol produced as a byproduct. The entire process emphasizes the recycling of nutrients and water, enhancing production efficiency.

8.4 Environmental benefits and potential challenges

The environmental benefits of microalgae-based biodiesel are significant, but several challenges must be addressed to fully realize its potential. One of the primary environmental advantages is the ability of microalgae to sequester carbon dioxide (CO₂) during photosynthesis, which can help mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, microalgae cultivation can utilize wastewater, thereby reducing the need for freshwater and contributing to wastewater treatment. This dual role not only enhances water conservation but also provides a sustainable nutrient source for the algae. However, the high energy consumption required for processes such as harvesting, drying, and lipid extraction poses a challenge. These processes can diminish the overall environmental benefits if not optimized for energy efficiency.

Furthermore, the use of chemical flocculants for harvesting and the potential nutrient runoff from cultivation ponds can impact local ecosystems negatively. Addressing these issues requires the development of more energy-efficient technologies and environmentally friendly practices. Economic feasibility also remains a hurdle, with high production costs limiting widespread adoption. Strategies to improve cost-efficiency include co-product valorization, process optimization, and the integration of renewable energy sources. Overall, while microalgae-based biodiesel holds great promise as a sustainable biofuel, overcoming these challenges is crucial for its successful implementation (Mallick et al., 2016).

9 Future Prospects and Research Directions

9.1 Advances in genetic engineering for enhanced lipid production

Genetic engineering holds significant promise for enhancing lipid production in marine microalgae, which is crucial for improving the efficiency and economic viability of biodiesel production. Recent advances in genetic engineering have focused on modifying metabolic pathways to increase lipid accumulation. Techniques such as CRISPR-Cas9 have been employed to knock out specific genes that compete for carbon, thereby redirecting the carbon flux towards lipid biosynthesis. For example, genetic modifications in Nannochloropsis species have resulted in a substantial increase in lipid content, enhancing their suitability for biodiesel production (Ghosh et al., 2016).

Moreover, advancements in systems biology and omics technologies have facilitated a deeper understanding of the complex regulatory networks governing lipid metabolism in microalgae. This knowledge enables the identification of key regulatory genes and the development of targeted genetic modifications to boost lipid productivity. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, including ensuring the stability of genetically modified strains and addressing potential ecological and ethical concerns associated with their large-scale deployment. Continued research in this area aims to overcome these obstacles and develop robust, high-lipid-producing microalgae strains for sustainable biodiesel production (Malcata, 2022).

9.2 Innovations in cultivation technologies and automation

Innovations in cultivation technologies and automation are critical for scaling up microalgae biodiesel production to commercial levels. Advances in photobioreactor design, including the development of more efficient and scalable systems, have been pivotal. Modern photobioreactors incorporate advanced materials and designs that enhance light penetration and distribution, thereby improving photosynthetic efficiency and biomass yield. Automation and real-time monitoring systems, utilizing sensors and IoT technologies, enable precise control of cultivation conditions such as temperature, pH, nutrient levels, and CO₂ concentration. These innovations reduce labor costs and increase the consistency and reliability of microalgae production.

Furthermore, hybrid systems combining open ponds and closed photobioreactors are being explored to leverage the cost benefits of open systems and the productivity advantages of closed systems. Automation extends to downstream processes as well, with automated harvesting and lipid extraction technologies enhancing overall efficiency. Despite these advancements, challenges such as high energy requirements and the need for cost-effective scaling solutions persist. Ongoing research focuses on optimizing these systems to achieve greater economic viability and environmental sustainability (Sunil Kumar and Buddolla, 2019).

9.3 Policy and regulatory support for marine microalgae biodiesel

Policy and regulatory support play a crucial role in the development and commercialization of marine microalgae biodiesel. Governments and international bodies are increasingly recognizing the potential of microalgae as a sustainable biofuel source and are implementing policies to support research, development, and commercialization. Incentives such as subsidies, tax breaks, and grants are being provided to encourage investment in microalgae biodiesel projects. Regulatory frameworks are also being established to ensure the safe and sustainable production of biofuels. For instance, the inclusion of microalgae in renewable energy targets and mandates can drive demand and provide a stable market for biodiesel producers (Zhu et al., 2017).

International collaborations and partnerships are being fostered to share knowledge, technology, and best practices. However, the regulatory landscape is still evolving, and there is a need for harmonized standards and guidelines to facilitate the global trade of microalgae-based biodiesel. Policymakers must balance the promotion of innovation with the need to address environmental and safety concerns associated with large-scale microalgae cultivation and genetic modification. Continued advocacy and collaboration among industry stakeholders, researchers, and policymakers are essential to create a supportive environment for the growth of the microalgae biodiesel sector (Veza et al., 2021).

10 Concluding Remarks

The production of biodiesel from marine microalgae offers several advantages, including high lipid content, rapid growth rates, and the ability to thrive in non-arable land and saline water. Key findings indicate that genetic engineering can significantly enhance lipid production by modifying metabolic pathways, making species like Nannochloropsis and Chlorella more efficient for biodiesel production. Innovations in cultivation technologies, such as advanced photobioreactors and automated systems, have improved the efficiency and scalability of microalgae cultivation. However, high production costs and energy consumption remain significant barriers. The economic analysis shows that although microalgae biodiesel production is feasible, further cost reductions and technological advancements are necessary for it to become competitive with fossil fuels.

To advance the commercial viability of microalgae biodiesel, industry and policymakers should focus on several key areas. First, increased funding and incentives for research and development are essential to drive technological innovations in genetic engineering and cultivation technologies. Policies that support the integration of microalgae cultivation with wastewater treatment and carbon capture can enhance sustainability and reduce costs. Furthermore, establishing standardized regulations and guidelines for the cultivation and processing of genetically modified microalgae will ensure environmental safety and public acceptance. Collaboration between academic institutions, industry, and government can facilitate the development of scalable, cost-effective production systems. Lastly, international cooperation and the sharing of best practices will be crucial for the global development of the microalgae biodiesel sector.

Marine microalgae hold significant promise as a sustainable and efficient source of biodiesel. The future of this technology lies in overcoming current economic and technical challenges through continuous innovation and supportive policy frameworks. With advances in genetic engineering and cultivation technologies, microalgae can potentially become a cornerstone of the biofuel industry, contributing to energy security and environmental sustainability. The integration of microalgae cultivation with wastewater treatment and carbon sequestration further enhances its appeal as a green technology. As research progresses and production costs decrease, the widespread adoption of microalgae-based biodiesel could play a critical role in transitioning to a more sustainable energy future.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the feedback from two anonymous peer reviewers on the manuscript of this study, whose careful evaluation and constructive suggestions have contributed to the improvement of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors affirm that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Arias D.M., Solé-Bundó M., Garfí M., Ferrer I., García J., and Uggetti E., 2018, Integrating microalgae tertiary treatment into activated sludge systems for energy and nutrients recovery from wastewater, Bioresource Technology, 247: 513-519.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.123

Arroussi H., Benhima R., El Mernissi N., Bouhfid R., Tilsaghani C., Bennis I., and Wahby I., 2017, Screening of marine microalgae strains from Moroccan coasts for biodiesel production, Renewable Energy, 113: 1515-1522.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.035

Atmanli A., 2020, Experimental comparison of biodiesel production performance of two different microalgae, Fuel, 278: 118311.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118311

Branco-Vieira M., Mata T., Martins A., Freitas M. V., and Caetano N., 2020, Economic analysis of microalgae biodiesel production in a small-scale facility, Energy Reports, 6: 325-332.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.156

Chai W.S., Tan W.G., Munawaroh H.S.H., Gupta V., Ho S.-H., and Show P., 2020, Multifaceted roles of microalgae in the application of wastewater biotreatment: A review, Environmental Pollution, 269: 116236.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116236

Cheah W.Y., Ling T., Show P., Juan J., Chang J.-S., and Lee D.-J., 2016, Cultivation in wastewaters for energy: A microalgae platform. Applied Energy, 179: 609-625.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.015

Daneshvar E., Zarrinmehr M.J., Malekzadeh Hashtjin A., Farhadian O., and Bhatnagar A., 2018, Versatile applications of freshwater and marine water microalgae in dairy wastewater treatment, lipid extraction and tetracycline biosorption, Bioresource Technology, 268: 523-530.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.032

Deshmukh S., Bala K., and Kumar R., 2019, Selection of microalgae species based on their lipid content, fatty acid profile and apparent fuel properties for biodiesel production, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26: 24462-24473.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05692-z

Dharani G., Peter D.M., Leema J.T.M., Kumar T.S., Thirupathi K., Josephine A., Kirubagaran R., and Atmanand M., 2020, Mass culture of marine microalgae Chlorella vulgaris (NIOT-74) and production of biodiesel, Current Science, 118(11): 1731-1738.

https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v118/i11/1731-1738

Dickinson S., Mientus M., Frey D., Amini-Hajibashi A., Ozturk S., Shaikh F., Sengupta D., and El-Halwagi M., 2017, A review of biodiesel production from microalgae, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 19: 637-668.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1309-6

Díez-Montero R., Belohlav V., Ortíz A., Uggetti E., García-Galán M.J., and García J., 2020, Evaluation of daily and seasonal variations in a semi-closed photobioreactor for microalgae-based bioremediation of agricultural runoff at full-scale, Algal Research-Biomass Biofuels and Bioproducts, 47: 101859.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2020.101859

Ge S., and Champagne P., 2017, Cultivation of the marine macroalgae Chaetomorpha linum in municipal wastewater for nutrient recovery and biomass production, Environmental Science and Technology, 51(6): 3558-3566.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06039

Ghosh A., Khanra S., Mondal M., Halder G., Tiwari O., Saini S., and Bhowmick T., 2016, Progress toward isolation of strains and genetically engineered strains of microalgae for production of biofuel and other value added chemicals: A review, Energy Conversion and Management, 113: 104-118.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.01.050

Guldhe A., Misra R., Singh P., Rawat I., and Bux F., 2016, An innovative electrochemical process to alleviate the challenges for harvesting of small size microalgae by using non-sacrificial carbon electrodes, Algal Research-Biomass Biofuels and Bioproducts, 19: 292-298.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2015.08.014

Gupta P.L., Lee S.-M., and Choi H.-J., 2015, A mini review: photobioreactors for large scale algal cultivation, World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 31: 1409-1417.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-015-1892-4

Gupta S., Pawar S., and Pandey R., 2019, Current practices and challenges in using microalgae for treatment of nutrient-rich wastewater from agro-based industries, The Science of the Total Environment, 687: 1107-1126.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.115

He Y., Wang X., Wei H., Zhang J., Chen B., and Chen F., 2019, Direct enzymatic ethanolysis of potential Nannochloropsis biomass for co-production of sustainable biodiesel and nutraceutical eicosapentaenoic acid, Biotechnology for Biofuels, 12: 78.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-019-1418-7

He Y., Zhang B., Guo S., Guo Z., Chen B., and Wang M., 2020, Sustainable biodiesel production from the green microalgae Nannochloropsis: Novel integrated processes from cultivation to enzyme-assisted extraction and ethanolysis of lipids, Energy Conversion and Management, 209: 112618.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112618

Hernández-García A., Velasquez-Orta S.B., Novelo E., Yáñez-Noguez I., Monje-Ramirez I., and Orta Ledesma M.T., 2019, Wastewater-leachate treatment by microalgae: Biomass, carbohydrate, and lipid production, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 174: 435-444.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.02.052

Hinterholz C.L., Trigueros D., Módenes A., Borba C.E., Scheufele F.B., Schuelter A.R., and Kroumov A., 2019, Computational fluid dynamics applied for the improvement of a flat-plate photobioreactor towards high-density microalgae cultures, Biochemical Engineering Journal, 151: 107257.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2019.107257

Huang G., Chen F., Wei D., Zhang X., and Chen G., 2018, Biodiesel Production by Microalgal Biotechnology, Renewable Energy, 87(1): 38-46.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.06.016

Kawaroe M., Hwangbo J., Augustine D., and Putra H.A., 2015, Comparison of density, specific growth rate, biomass weight, and doubling time of microalgae Nannochloropsis sp. cultivated in Open Raceway Pond and Photobioreactor, Aacl Bioflux, 8: 740-750.

Kawaroe M., Prartono T., Sunuddin A., and Saputra D., 2016, Marine microalgae tetraselmis suecica as flocculant agent of bio-flocculation method, Hayati Journal of Biosciences, 23: 62-66.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjb.2015.09.003

Kim G.Y., Yun Y.M., Shin H., and Han J.I., 2017, Cultivation of four microalgae species in the effluent of anaerobic digester for biodiesel production, Bioresource Technology, 224: 738-742.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.048

Kwon M., and Yeom S., 2017, Evaluation of closed photobioreactor types and operation variables for enhancing lipid productivity of Nannochloropsis sp. KMMCC 290 for biodiesel production, Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, 22: 604-611.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-017-0107-2

Loera-Quezada M.M., Leyva-González M.A., Velázquez-Juárez G., Sánchez-Calderón L., Do Nascimento M., López-Arredondo D., and Herrera-Estrella L., 2016, A novel genetic engineering platform for the effective management of biological contaminants for the production of microalgae, Plant Biotechnology Journal, 14: 2066-2076.

https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12564

Malcata F., 2022, Engineering of microalgae toward biodiesel: Facts and prospects, Journal of The American Oil Chemists Society, 111 River St, Hoboken 07030-5774, Nj Usa: Wiley, 99: 48.

Mallick N., Bagchi S., Koley S., and Singh A.K., 2016, Progress and Challenges in Microalgal Biodiesel Production, Frontiers in Microbiology, 7: 1019.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01019

Mayers J.J., Nilsson A., Albers E., and Flynn K., 2017, Nutrients from anaerobic digestion effluents for cultivation of the microalga Nannochloropsis sp. - Impact on growth, biochemical composition and the potential for cost and environmental impact savings, Algal Research-Biomass Biofuels and Bioproducts, 26: 275-286.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2017.08.007

Mitra M., and Mishra S., 2019, A biorefinery from Nannochloropsis spp. utilizing wastewater resources, Application of Microalgae in Wastewater Treatment, pp.123-145.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13909-4_6

Mohammady N., El-Khatib K., El-Galad M., Abo El-Enin S.A., Attia N., El-Araby R., El Diwani G.E., and Manning S., 2020, Preliminary study on the economic assessment of culturing Nannochloropsis sp. in Egypt for the production of biodiesel and high-value biochemicals, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 12: 3319-3331.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00878-9

Molina-Miras A., Bueso-Sánchez A., Cerón-García M.C., Sánchez-Mirón A., Contreras-Gómez A., and García-Camacho F., 2022, Effect of nitrogen, phosphorous, and light colimitation on amphidinol production and growth in the marine dinoflagellate microalga Amphidinium carterae, Toxins, 14(9): 594.

https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins14090594

Narala R.R., Garg S., Sharma K., Thomas-Hall S., Deme M., Li Y., and Schenk P., 2016, Comparison of microalgae cultivation in photobioreactor, open raceway pond, and a two-stage hybrid system, Frontiers in Energy Research, 4: 29.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2016.00029

Nwokoagbara E., Olaleye A.K., and Wang M., 2015, Biodiesel from microalgae: The use of multi-criteria decision analysis for strain selection. Fuel, 159: 241-249.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.06.074

Patil P., Dandamudi K.P.R., Wang J., Deng Q., and Deng S., 2018, Extraction of bio-oils from algae with supercritical carbon dioxide and co-solvents. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 135: 60-68.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.12.019

Paudel A., Jessop M.J., Stubbins S.H., Champagne P., and Jessop P., 2015, Extraction of lipids from microalgae using CO2-expanded methanol and liquid CO2, Bioresource Technology, 184: 286-290.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.111

Peng X., Meng F., Wang Y., Yi X., and Cui H., 2020a, Effect of pH, Temperature, and CO2 Concentration on Growth and Lipid Accumulation of Nannochloropsis sp. MASCC 11, Journal of Ocean University of China, 19: 1183-1192.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-020-4302-y

Peng Y.Y., Gao F., Yang H.L., Wu H., Li C., Lu M.M., and Yang Z.Y., 2020b, Simultaneous removal of nutrient and sulfonamides from marine aquaculture wastewater by concentrated and attached cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris in an algal biofilm membrane photobioreactor (BF-MPBR), The Science of the Total Environment, 725: 138524.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138524

Qunju H., Xiang W., Fangfang Y., Tao L., Guanghua W., Shikun D., Hualian W., and Jiewei F., 2016, Evaluation of five Nannochloropsis Sp. strains for biodiesel and poly-unsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) production, Journal of Marine Science: Research and Development, 4(1): 1000128.

https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-0737.1000128

Sabu S., Singh I.S.B., and Joseph V., 2017, Molecular Identification and Comparative Evaluation of Tropical Marine Microalgae for Biodiesel Production, Marine Biotechnology, 19: 328-344.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10126-017-9754-8

Sevda S., Bhattacharya S., Reesh I.A., Bhuvanesh S., and Sreekrishnan T., 2017, Challenges in the design and operation of an efficient photobioreactor for microalgae cultivation and hydrogen production, Biohydrogen Production: Sustainability of Current Technology and Future Perspective, PP.147-162.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3577-4_7

Shanmugam S., Mathimani T., Anto S., Sudhakar M., Kumar S.S., and Pugazhendhi A., 2020, Cell density, Lipidomic profile, and fatty acid characterization as selection criteria in bioprospecting of microalgae and cyanobacterium for biodiesel production, Bioresource Technology, 304: 123061.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123061

Shimako A., Tiruta-Barna L., Pigné Y., Benetto E., Gutiérrez T., Guiraud P., and Ahmadi A., 2016, Environmental assessment of bioenergy production from microalgae based systems, Journal of Cleaner Production, 139: 51-60.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.003

Singha N.B., Deb U. K., and Shahriar M., 2017, Investigation of flow dynamics for a microalgae suspension in an open pond system, American Journal of Computational Mathematics, 7(3): 195-207.

https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcm.2017.73018

Solimeno A., Acién F.G., and García J., 2017, Mechanistic model for design, analysis, operation and control of microalgae cultures: Calibration and application to tubular photobioreactors, Algal Research-Biomass Biofuels and Bioproducts, 21: 236-246.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2016.11.023

Sun B., 2023, Practical design of hybrid photobioreactor system for economic feasibility and environmental sustainability, Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment, 27(9): 17-27.

https://doi.org/10.25303/2709rjce017027

Sunil Kumar M., and Buddolla V., 2019, Future prospects of biodiesel production by microalgae: a short review, Recent Developments in Applied Microbiology and Biochemistry, pp.161-166.

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816328-3.00012-X

Taher H., Giwa A., Abusabiekeh H., and Al-Zuhair S., 2020, Biodiesel production from Nannochloropsis gaditana using supercritical CO2 for lipid extraction and immobilized lipase transesterification: Economic and environmental impact assessments, Fuel Processing Technology, 198: 106249.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106249

Taleb A., Kandilian R., Touchard R., Montalescot V., Rinaldi T., Taha S., Takache H., Marchal L., Legrand J., and Pruvost J., 2016, Screening of freshwater and seawater microalgae strains in fully controlled photobioreactors for biodiesel production, Bioresource Technology, 218: 480-490.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.086

Tzima S., Georgiopoulou I., Louli V., and Magoulas K., 2023, Recent Advances in Supercritical CO2 Extraction of Pigments, Lipids and Bioactive Compounds from Microalgae. Molecules, 28(3): 1410.

https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031410

Verfaillie A., Blockx J., Praveenkumar R., Thielemans W., and Muylaert K., 2020, Harvesting of marine microalgae using cationic cellulose nanocrystals, Carbohydrate Polymers, 240: 116165.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116165

Veza I., Said M. F.M., Abas M.A., Latiff Z.A., Perang M.R.M., and Djamari D.W., 2021, Future direction of microalgae biodiesel in Indonesia, Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 25(1): 1-6.

https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.25.1.16

Wen X., Du K., Wang Z., Peng X., Luo L., Tao H., Xu Y., Zhang D., Geng Y., and Li Y., 2016, Effective cultivation of microalgae for biofuel production: a pilot-scale evaluation of a novel oleaginous microalga Graesiella sp. WBG-1, Biotechnology for Biofuels, 9: 123.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0541-y

Yaakob M.A., Mohamed R., Al-Gheethi R., Ravishankar G.A., and Ambati R., 2021, Influence of nitrogen and phosphorus on microalgal growth, biomass, lipid, and fatty acid production: an overview, Cells, 10(2): 393

https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10020393

Zhao Z., Muylaert K., and Vankelecom I., 2021, Combining patterned membrane filtration and flocculation for economical microalgae harvesting. Water Research, 198: 117181.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117181

Zhou W., Wang Z., Xu J., and Ma L., 2018, Cultivation of microalgae Chlorella zofingiensis on municipal wastewater and biogas slurry towards bioenergy, Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 126(5): 644-648.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2018.05.006

Zhu L., Nugroho Y. K., Shakeel S., Li Z., Martinkauppi B., and Hiltunen E., 2017, Using microalgae to produce liquid transportation biodiesel: What is next? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78: 391-400.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.089

Zhuang L.L., Azimi Y., Yu D.J., Wu Y.H., and Hu H.Y., 2018, Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations on the growth of microalgae Scenedesmus. LX1 in suspended-solid phase photobioreactors (ssPBR), Biomass & Bioenergy, 109: 47-53.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.12.017