1 Introduction

Biofuel cells (BFCs) are innovative energy conversion devices that utilize biocatalysts to transform chemical energy into electrical energy. These devices have garnered significant attention due to their potential to provide sustainable and green energy solutions. BFCs can be categorized based on the type of biocatalyst used, including microbial fuel cells (MFCs), enzyme biofuel cells (EBFCs), organelle biofuel cells (OBFCs), and photocatalytic fuel cells (PFCs) (Zhang et al., 2021). Among these, EBFCs are particularly notable for their ability to operate under mild conditions, such as physiological temperatures and near-neutral pH, making them suitable for applications in medical implants, biosensors, and other devices (Zhang et al., 2021).

Enzyme-catalyzed biofuel cells (EBFCs) leverage the high specificity and catalytic efficiency of enzymes to convert bio-sourced fuels into electrical energy. These enzymes, such as glucose oxidase and laccase, offer several advantages over traditional metal catalysts, including lower cost, renewability, and biodegradability (Barelli et al., 2021). EBFCs have shown promise in a variety of applications, from powering implantable medical devices to serving as energy sources for portable electronic devices and self-powered sensors (Meredith and Minteer, 2012; Cosnier et al. 2016). The ability of EBFCs to generate electricity from body fluids, such as glucose in blood, further underscores their potential in biomedical applications (Cosnier et al. 2016; Liang, 2024).

Despite their potential, EBFCs face several challenges that hinder their widespread adoption. Key issues include low power density, short operational lifetimes, and stability concerns (Barelli et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2023). The immobilization of enzymes on conductive materials with high specific surface area and good biocompatibility has been identified as a critical factor in addressing these challenges (Zhang et al., 2021). Recent advancements in nanomaterials, such as carbon and metal nanomaterials, have shown promise in enhancing the performance and stability of EBFCs (Zhang et al., 2021). Additionally, innovative electrode designs and enzyme immobilization techniques are being explored to improve electron transfer rates and overall cell efficiency (Cooney et al., 2008; Zhou et al., 2023).

This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the design and performance optimization of enzyme-catalyzed biofuel cells (EBFCs). It seeks to explore the fundamental principles of EBFCs, the latest advancements in enzyme immobilization and electrode design, and the challenges that need to be addressed for their commercial viability. The study aims to identify opportunities to enhance the efficiency and stability of EBFCs, thereby paving the way for their broader applications in various fields, including environmental technologies and biomedical devices.

2 Fundamentals of Enzyme-Catalyzed Biofuel Cells

2.1 Basic principles and mechanisms of biofuel cells

Enzyme-catalyzed biofuel cells (EBCs) are devices that convert chemical energy into electrical energy using biocatalysts, specifically enzymes, to facilitate redox reactions. These cells operate by oxidizing a fuel substrate at the anode and reducing an oxidant at the cathode, with the enzymes acting as catalysts to enhance the reaction rates. The fundamental mechanism involves the transfer of electrons from the fuel to the electrode through the enzyme, which can occur via direct electron transfer (DET) or mediated electron transfer (MET) (Cooney et al., 2008; Meredith and Minteer, 2012).

2.2 Role of enzymes in biofuel cells

Enzymes play a crucial role in EBCs by catalyzing the oxidation and reduction reactions necessary for energy conversion. They provide specificity for the substrates and operate under mild conditions, making them suitable for biofuel cells. Enzymes such as glucose oxidase (GOx) and fructose dehydrogenase (FDH) are commonly used due to their ability to facilitate efficient electron transfer processes (Kamitaka et al., 2007; Christwardana et al., 2018). The stability and activity of these enzymes are critical for the performance and longevity of the biofuel cells (Chung et al., 2016; Christwardana et al., 2017).

2.3 Types of enzyme catalysts used

Various enzymes are employed in EBCs, each selected based on the specific fuel and desired reaction. Commonly used enzymes include: Glucose oxidase (GOx): Catalyzes the oxidation of glucose to gluconolactone, often used in conjunction with other enzymes or mediators to enhance performance (Hyun et al., 2015; Christwardana et al., 2017; Christwardana et al., 2018). Fructose dehydrogenase (FDH): Facilitates the oxidation of fructose, often used in DET-type bioelectrocatalysis (Kamitaka et al., 2007; Bollella et al., 2018). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP): Used in combination with GOx to improve the reduction of hydrogen peroxide, enhancing the overall catalytic activity and stability (Chung et al., 2018). Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), Aldehyde dehydrogenase (A1DH), and Formate dehydrogenase (FDH): These enzymes work in a cascade to achieve complete oxidation of methanol to carbon dioxide, demonstrating the use of multi-enzyme systems for complex substrates (Kar et al., 2011).

2.4 Electron transfer mechanisms in enzyme-catalyzed biofuel cells

Electron transfer in EBCs can occur through two primary mechanisms: Direct electron transfer (DET): In this mechanism, electrons are transferred directly between the enzyme and the electrode without the need for mediators. This is facilitated by the close proximity and proper orientation of the enzyme's active site to the electrode surface. Enzymes like FDH and certain multi-copper oxidases have shown efficient DET capabilities (Kamitaka et al., 2007; Meredith and Minteer, 2012; Bollella et al., 2018). Mediated electron transfer (MET): This involves the use of redox mediators that shuttle electrons between the enzyme and the electrode. Mediators can enhance the electron transfer rate and are often used when DET is inefficient or not feasible. The choice of mediator and its interaction with the enzyme and electrode are critical for optimizing the performance of MET-based biofuel cells (Cooney et al., 2008; Meredith and Minteer, 2012).

3 Enzyme Selection and Engineering

3.1 Criteria for selecting enzymes

The selection of appropriate enzymes is a critical step in the design of enzyme-catalyzed biofuel cells (EBFCs). Key criteria include the enzyme's catalytic efficiency, stability under operational conditions, and compatibility with the biofuel cell's design. Enzymes such as oxidoreductases are often preferred due to their ability to facilitate electron transfer processes essential for biofuel cell operation (Bilal et al., 2017). Additionally, the enzyme's specificity towards the substrate, resistance to inhibitors, and ability to function in the presence of various solvents are important considerations (Singh et al., 2013). The enzyme's natural abundance and cost-effectiveness also play significant roles in the selection process (Zhou et al., 2023).

3.2 Genetic and protein engineering approaches to improve enzyme stability

To enhance the stability and performance of enzymes in EBFCs, genetic and protein engineering techniques are employed. These approaches include directed evolution, rational design, and chemical modification. Directed evolution involves iterative rounds of mutagenesis and selection to evolve enzymes with desired traits, such as increased thermal stability or resistance to denaturation (Bilal et al., 2017). Rational design uses computational models to predict and introduce specific mutations that enhance enzyme stability and activity (Singh et al., 2013). Chemical modifications, such as the addition of stabilizing agents or the formation of covalent bonds, can further improve enzyme robustness (Bernal et al., 2018). Combining these techniques can lead to the development of enzymes with superior performance in the challenging environments of biofuel cells (Rehm et al., 2016).

3.3 Enzyme immobilization techniques

Enzyme immobilization is a crucial strategy to enhance the operational stability and reusability of enzymes in EBFCs. Various immobilization techniques are employed, including adsorption, covalent bonding, encapsulation, and cross-linking. Adsorption involves the physical attachment of enzymes to support materials, which can be simple but may result in weak binding (Cooney et al., 2008). Covalent bonding creates strong, stable links between enzymes and supports, improving durability and resistance to leaching (Pelosi et al., 2022). Encapsulation traps enzymes within a matrix, protecting them from environmental factors while allowing substrate access (Liu et al., 2021). Cross-linking forms networks of enzyme molecules, enhancing stability and activity (Mateo et al., 2007). Advanced immobilization strategies, such as in situ self-assembly and the use of multifunctional supports, further optimize enzyme performance by ensuring proper orientation and accessibility of active sites (Figure 1) (Rehm et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2023).

4 Electrode Design and Materials

4.1 Selection of electrode materials

The selection of electrode materials is crucial for the performance of enzyme-catalyzed biofuel cells. Various materials have been explored to enhance the efficiency of these cells. Carbon-based materials, such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and carbon nanodots (CNDs), have shown significant promise due to their high surface area and excellent electrical conductivity (Scherbahn et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2017). For instance, vertically aligned carbon nanotubes (vaCNT) have been used to achieve a maximal power density of 122 µW/cm², demonstrating better power exhibition and stability compared to other materials (Scherbahn et al., 2014). Additionally, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and macroporous gold electrodes have been employed to enhance bioelectrocatalytic activity, resulting in significantly higher power densities (Deng et al., 2008). The use of composite materials, such as polypyrrole (PPy) combined with CNTs and Fe₃O₄, has also been shown to improve the bioelectrocatalysis of enzymes, further enhancing the performance of biofuel cells (Perveen et al., 2021).

4.2 Surface modification techniques to improve enzyme-electrode interactions

Surface modification techniques are essential to improve enzyme-electrode interactions, which are critical for efficient electron transfer. One effective method is the use of conductive polymers, such as poly (3-aminobenzoic acid-co-2-methoxyaniline-5-sulfonic acid) (PABMSA), which can act as promoters for enzyme bioelectrocatalysis (Scherbahn et al., 2014). Another approach involves the use of electrostatic layer-by-layer (LbL) techniques to create multilayer biocatalyst immobilization on electrodes, significantly enhancing bioelectrocatalytic activity and power output (Deng et al., 2008). Additionally, 3D printing technology has been utilized to create high-porosity electrodes, which are then surface-modified to improve enzyme immobilization and electrocatalysis (Jayapiriya and Goel, 2020). These techniques help in achieving better electron transfer and stability, which are crucial for the long-term performance of biofuel cells.

4.3 Nanomaterial-based electrodes for enhanced performance

Nanomaterials have been extensively studied for their potential to enhance the performance of biofuel cells. The use of nanomaterials, such as carbon nanotubes, graphene, and metal oxides, provides a close wiring for electron transfer between the biocatalyst and the electrode, thereby improving efficiency (Poulpiquet et al., 2014; Mishra et al., 2021). For example, carbon nanodots (CNDs) have been used as immobilizing matrices and electron relays, resulting in high open-circuit voltages and power densities in methanol/O₂ biofuel cells (Wu et al., 2017). The incorporation of nanocomposites, such as PPy/Au/CNT@Fe₃O₄, has also been shown to significantly improve the surface area and electrical communication, leading to enhanced bioelectrocatalysis and higher current densities (Perveen et al., 2021). These advancements in nanomaterial-based electrodes are critical for developing more efficient and stable biofuel cells.

5 Fuel Selection and Utilization

5.1 Types of fuels used in enzyme-catalyzed biofuel cells

Enzyme-catalyzed biofuel cells (EBCs) utilize a variety of fuels, primarily focusing on renewable and biologically derived substrates. Common fuels include simple sugars like glucose, which are oxidized by enzymes such as glucose oxidase or dehydrogenase (Yamamoto et al., 2013; Gross et al., 2017). Additionally, more complex substrates like starchy biomass can be directly utilized through the action of enzyme cascades, which break down the starch into simpler sugars that can then be oxidized (Yamamoto et al., 2013). This approach not only broadens the range of usable fuels but also enhances the overall efficiency of the biofuel cells by enabling the use of readily available and inexpensive substrates.

5.2 Substrate optimization for maximizing energy output

Optimizing the substrate concentration and conditions is crucial for maximizing the energy output of EBCs. Studies have shown that the concentration of substrates, enzyme cofactors, and electron transfer mediators significantly impact the power density of the cells. For instance, an optimal concentration of lactate, NAD⁺, and CaCl₂ was found to yield the highest power density in a lactate-based EBC (Jeon et al., 2008). Additionally, the pH and temperature of the reaction environment are critical parameters that need to be finely tuned to ensure maximum enzyme activity and stability (Cooney et al., 2008; Jeon et al., 2008). Advanced techniques such as response surface methodology (RSM) have been employed to systematically optimize these conditions, leading to significant improvements in the performance of EBCs.

5.3 Renewable and waste-derived fuels

The use of renewable and waste-derived fuels in EBCs is a promising approach to enhance sustainability and reduce environmental impact. Whole-cell biocatalysis has been explored to convert waste biomass into valuable biofuels, leveraging the robustness of microbial systems to process a wide range of substrates (Madavi et al., 2021). This method not only provides a sustainable source of fuel but also addresses waste management issues by converting waste materials into energy. Additionally, innovative approaches have been developed to utilize pollutants as fuels in EBCs, demonstrating the versatility and environmental benefits of these systems (Li et al., 2020). For example, a novel single-enzymatic biofuel cell has been designed to use persistent pollutants like bisphenol A and hydroquinone as fuel, showcasing the potential for wastewater recycling and pollutant degradation (Li et al., 2020).

6 Case Study: Successful Implementations in Enzyme-Catalyzed Biofuel Cells

6.1 Case study 1: medical devices and glucose biofuel cells

Enzyme-catalyzed biofuel cells (EBFCs) have shown significant promise in powering medical devices, particularly those that can utilize glucose as a fuel source. For instance, a study demonstrated the development of a glucose/oxygen biofuel cell with a three-dimensional macroporous gold film-based biocathode and a bacterial surface-displayed glucose dehydrogenase-based bioanode. This configuration achieved a high power output of (55.8±2.0) μW cm^-2 and maintained 84% of its maximal power density after 55 hours of continuous operation, highlighting its potential for long-term applications in medical devices (Hou et al., 2014). Another study optimized a membraneless glucose/oxygen enzymatic biofuel cell, achieving a maximum power output of 20 μW cm^-2 and an estimated half-life of up to 12 hours, which is crucial for the reliable operation of implantable medical devices (Shao et al., 2013).

6.2 Case study 2: wastewater treatment and environmental applications

Enzyme-catalyzed biofuel cells have also been explored for environmental applications, such as wastewater treatment. These biofuel cells can harness the chemical energy from organic waste to generate electricity, thus providing a dual benefit of waste reduction and energy production. A review highlighted the potential of enzymatic biofuel cells in various environmental applications, emphasizing their ability to operate under mild conditions and their biodegradability, which makes them suitable for sustainable wastewater treatment processes (Figure 2) (Barelli et al., 2021). Additionally, the use of bioelectrocatalytic carbon nanotube-based pellets in a flow-through fuel cell design demonstrated the feasibility of integrating multiple biofuel cells to achieve higher power outputs, which can be beneficial for large-scale environmental applications (Abreu et al., 2017).

6.3 Case study 3: portable power systems for remote areas

The development of portable power systems using enzyme-catalyzed biofuel cells is another area of successful implementation. These systems are particularly valuable in remote areas where conventional power sources are unavailable. A study on mediatorless high-power glucose biofuel cells based on compressed carbon nanotube-enzyme electrodes achieved a power density of up to 1.3 mW cm^-2 and an open circuit voltage of 0.95 V. The biofuel cell remained stable for one month and delivered 1 mW cm^-2 under physiological conditions, making it a viable option for portable power systems (Zebda et al., 2011). Another research effort focused on the assembly and stacking of flow-through enzymatic bioelectrodes for high-power glucose fuel cells, which allowed for the convenient assembly of multiple cells to reach the necessary voltage and power for portable electronic devices without the need for additional energy management systems (Abreu et al., 2017).

6.4 Key insights from case studies and lessons learned

The case studies presented highlight several key insights and lessons learned from the successful implementations of enzyme-catalyzed biofuel cells: Long-term stability: Achieving long-term stability is crucial for the practical application of EBFCs, particularly in medical devices and portable power systems. Innovations such as the use of bacterial surface-displayed enzymes and optimized electrode materials have shown promise in enhancing stability (Shao et al., 2013; Hou et al., 2014). Power output optimization: The power output of EBFCs can be significantly improved through the optimization of enzyme immobilization techniques, electrode materials, and cell configurations. Studies have demonstrated that the use of advanced materials like carbon nanotubes and macroporous gold films can lead to higher power densities (Zebda et al., 2011; Hou et al., 2014). Scalability and integration: For environmental applications and portable power systems, the ability to scale up and integrate multiple biofuel cells is essential. Flow-through designs and the stacking of bioelectrodes have been effective strategies to achieve higher power outputs and meet the energy demands of larger systems (Abreu et al., 2017). Sustainability and biodegradability: The environmental benefits of EBFCs, such as their ability to operate under mild conditions and their biodegradability, make them suitable for sustainable applications in wastewater treatment and other environmental processes (Barelli et al., 2021). These insights underscore the potential of enzyme-catalyzed biofuel cells in various applications and highlight the ongoing advancements needed to overcome current limitations and enhance their practical viability.

7 Performance Optimization Strategies

7.1 Improving enzyme longevity and stability

One of the primary challenges in the development of enzyme-catalyzed biofuel cells (EBFCs) is the limited operational stability and longevity of the enzymes used. Various strategies have been explored to address this issue. For instance, the encapsulation of enzymes within protective matrices has shown promise. A study demonstrated that using single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) to encapsulate glucose oxidase (GOx) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) significantly enhanced enzyme stability, even in the presence of molecular inhibitors and high temperatures (Yimamumaimaiti et al., 2020). Additionally, covalent immobilization techniques on commercial polymers have been employed to improve enzyme durability, resulting in biofuel cells that maintain power output over extended periods (Pelosi et al., 2022). These approaches are crucial for the practical application of EBFCs in wearable and implantable devices.

7.2 Enhancing power density and energy efficiency

Enhancing the power density and energy efficiency of EBFCs is essential for their viability as power sources. Multi-enzyme catalysis systems have been identified as a key strategy to achieve this goal. For example, the use of enzyme cascades, where multiple enzymes work sequentially to fully oxidize the fuel, has been shown to significantly increase power density. A study utilizing a DNA scaffold to organize an invertase/glucose oxidase enzyme cascade reported a 75% increase in power density compared to free enzyme systems (Nguyen et al., 2014). Furthermore, the integration of advanced nanomaterials, such as carbon nanodots and carbon nanotube (CNT) sponges, has been shown to enhance electron transfer and improve overall cell performance (Huang et al., 2019). These innovations are critical for developing high-performance EBFCs.

7.3 Strategies for minimizing energy losses

Minimizing energy losses in EBFCs involves optimizing both the bioanode and biocathode to reduce overpotentials and improve electron transfer efficiency. One effective approach is the use of redox polymers to wire enzymes to the electrode surface, thereby facilitating direct electron transfer. For instance, a membraneless glucose/oxygen biofuel cell utilizing a redox-polymer-modified anode achieved high coulombic efficiency and power output by optimizing the enzyme and polymer composition (Shao et al., 2013). Additionally, the design of efficient enzyme-electrode interfaces, such as the use of mixed operational/storage electrodes, has been shown to reduce energy losses and enhance cell performance (Huang et al., 2019). These strategies are essential for maximizing the efficiency and output of EBFCs.

8 Applications of Enzyme-Catalyzed Biofuel Cells

8.1 Portable power generation

Enzyme-catalyzed biofuel cells (EBFCs) have shown significant potential in the realm of portable power generation. Due to their ability to operate under mild conditions such as ambient temperature and near-neutral pH, EBFCs are well-suited for powering portable electronic devices and sensors. The compact and miniaturized nature of these cells, facilitated by the use of enzymes as biocatalysts, makes them ideal for integration into small-scale devices (Barelli et al., 2019; Barelli et al., 2021). Additionally, the low cost and renewability of enzymes contribute to the feasibility of using EBFCs in portable power applications (Barelli et al., 2021). Recent advancements in enzyme immobilization techniques and the use of conductive nanomaterials have further enhanced the performance and stability of EBFCs, making them more viable for practical use in portable power generation (Wen and Eychmüller, 2016; Barelli et al., 2019).

8.2 Medical applications

EBFCs have garnered considerable interest in the medical field, particularly for their potential use in implantable and wearable medical devices. The biocompatibility and specificity of enzymes towards their substrates allow for the development of biofuel cells that can operate within the human body, utilizing physiological fluids such as blood glucose as fuel (Barton et al., 2004; Barelli et al., 2019). This makes EBFCs suitable for powering implantable medical devices, such as pacemakers and drug delivery systems, as well as wearable health monitoring devices (Yu and Scott, 2010; Huang et al., 2020). The ability of EBFCs to generate power in vivo under physiological conditions has been demonstrated, highlighting their potential to revolutionize the field of medical implants and biosensors (Barton et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2021). However, challenges such as enzyme stability and power output need to be addressed to fully realize the potential of EBFCs in medical applications (Huang et al., 2020).

8.3 Environmental and waste treatment applications

The application of EBFCs extends beyond portable and medical devices to environmental and waste treatment. EBFCs can be employed to generate power from organic substrates found in waste streams, such as sewage and agro-industrial waste, thereby providing a sustainable and eco-friendly energy solution (Barton et al., 2004; Barelli et al., 2019). The specificity of enzymes towards their substrates allows for the efficient conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, contributing to waste management and environmental protection (Barelli et al., 2019). Additionally, the integration of EBFCs with biosensors can facilitate the monitoring and treatment of environmental pollutants, further enhancing their utility in environmental applications (Wen and Eychmüller, 2016; Zhang et al., 2021). The development of EBFCs for environmental and waste treatment applications is still in its early stages, but the potential benefits make it a promising area of research (Barton et al., 2004; Barelli et al., 2019).

9 Challenges and Future Perspectives

9.1 Limitations in current technologies

Enzyme-catalyzed biofuel cells (EBCs) have shown significant promise as sustainable energy sources due to their ability to operate under mild conditions and utilize renewable biocatalysts. However, several limitations hinder their widespread application. One of the primary challenges is the low energy and power densities that EBCs currently exhibit, which are insufficient for many practical applications (Minteer et al., 2007; Xiao et al., 2019). Additionally, the operational stability of these cells is a major concern, as enzymes tend to degrade over time, leading to a decrease in performance (Rasmussen et al., 2016; Barelli et al., 2021). The inefficient oxidation of fuels and limited voltage output further restrict the efficiency of EBCs (Minteer et al., 2007; Xiao et al., 2019). Moreover, the high cost and complexity of the materials and methods used for enzyme immobilization and electrode design pose significant barriers to the industrial scalability of these technologies (Pelosi et al., 2022).

9.2 Future directions in enzyme engineering

To overcome the current limitations, future research in enzyme engineering should focus on several key areas. Enhancing the stability and activity of enzymes through genetic and chemical modifications can significantly improve the performance and longevity of EBCs (Xiao et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2021). Developing novel immobilization techniques that ensure a stable and efficient enzyme-electrode interface is crucial for maintaining high catalytic activity over extended periods (Barelli et al., 2021; Pelosi et al., 2022). Additionally, employing enzyme cascades for the complete oxidation of fuels can lead to higher energy densities (Xiao et al., 2019). The integration of nanomaterials to facilitate electron transfer and improve enzyme loading on electrodes is another promising direction (Xiao et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2021). These advancements in enzyme engineering will be pivotal in making EBCs more viable for commercial applications.

9.3 Integration with other renewable energy systems

The integration of EBCs with other renewable energy systems presents an exciting opportunity to enhance their overall efficiency and applicability. Combining EBCs with supercapacitors can help address the issue of low power density by providing a means to store and deliver energy more effectively (Xiao et al., 2019). Additionally, hybrid systems that incorporate solar energy harvesting technologies, such as biophotoelectrodes, can create synergistic effects, leading to more efficient energy conversion and storage (Ruff et al., 2019). The development of such integrated systems can pave the way for the use of EBCs in a broader range of applications, including portable and implantable electronic devices, biosensors, and wearable technologies (Barelli et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021). By leveraging the strengths of multiple renewable energy sources, the limitations of EBCs can be mitigated, making them a more attractive option for sustainable energy solutions.

10 Concluding Remarks

This study has explored the design and performance optimization of enzyme-catalyzed biofuel cells (EBCs), focusing on various aspects such as enzyme immobilization techniques, electrode structures, and the impact of different operational parameters. Key findings from the research include: Enzyme immobilization and electrode design: Different enzyme immobilization techniques and electrode structures significantly influence the performance of EBCs. For instance, the use of bi-enzyme catalysts and cross-linkers like terephthalaldehyde (TPA) has been shown to enhance catalytic activity and electrical performance. Additionally, the development of novel biocathodes using materials like Prussian blue and poly(pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid) has demonstrated excellent electrocatalytic activity and stability. Optimization of enzyme patterns and flow designs: Computational studies have highlighted the importance of enzyme-specific turnover numbers and the arrangement of enzymes in achieving high current densities and fuel utilization. Mixed enzyme patterning tailored to individual turnover rates has been identified as an optimal strategy. Furthermore, flow designs in EBCs have been shown to significantly impact power output and long-term stability, with various designs being analyzed for their performance. Simulation and experimental validation: Simulations of multi-step enzyme catalysis and cofactor-mediated electron transfer have provided insights into the kinetic parameters and optimal conditions for methanol oxidation in biofuel cells. These simulations closely match experimental data, indicating that cell performance is controlled by NAD+ transport and NADH oxidation kinetics. Long-term stability and power output: Despite the promising results, long-term stability and high power output remain significant challenges for EBCs. Studies have shown that optimizing enzyme concentrations and employing suitable immobilization techniques can enhance durability and performance. For example, a novel flow-based EBC with covalently immobilized enzymes demonstrated power generation over three weeks.

The future of enzyme-catalyzed biofuel cells holds great promise, particularly in the context of sustainable and green energy solutions. The advancements in enzyme immobilization techniques, electrode materials, and computational modeling have paved the way for significant improvements in the performance and stability of EBCs. However, several challenges need to be addressed to realize their full potential: Enhancing stability and power output: Continued research is needed to improve the long-term stability and power output of EBCs. This includes exploring new materials for enzyme immobilization, optimizing enzyme concentrations, and developing more efficient electrode designs. Scalability and industrial viability: For EBCs to become commercially viable, it is essential to focus on scalability and cost-effectiveness. The use of commercially available polymers and simple immobilization techniques can enhance the economic feasibility of EBCs, making them suitable for a wide range of applications. Integration with wearable and medical devices: The potential applications of EBCs in powering wearable devices and in vivo diagnostic tools are particularly exciting. The mild operating conditions and biodegradability of enzymes make EBCs ideal candidates for such applications. Future research should focus on integrating EBCs with these devices to harness their full potential. Environmental impact and sustainability: As the world moves towards more sustainable energy solutions, EBCs offer a renewable and environmentally friendly alternative to traditional fuel cells. Continued efforts to optimize their performance and reduce their environmental footprint will be crucial in promoting their adoption.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate Professor Julie Luo and Dr. J. Fang for their constructive feedback during the writing process, which was essential for improving and refining our thesis.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors affirm that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Abreu C., Nedellec Y., Gross A., Ondel O., Buret F., Goff A., Holzinger M., and Cosnier S., 2017, Assembly and stacking of flow-through enzymatic bioelectrodes for high power glucose fuel cells, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 9(28): 23836-23842.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b06717

Barelli L., Bidini G., Calzoni E., Cesaretti A., Michele A., Emiliani C., Gammaitoni L., and Sisani E., 2019, Enzymatic fuel cell technology for energy production from bio-sources, AIP Conf. Proc., 2191(1): 020014.

https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5138747

Barelli L., Bidini G., Pelosi D., and Sisani E., 2021, Enzymatic biofuel cells: a review on flow designs, Energies, 14(4): 910.

https://doi.org/10.3390/EN14040910

Barton S., Gallaway J., and Atanassov P., 2004, Enzymatic biofuel cells for implantable and microscale devices, Chemical Reviews, 104(10): 4867-4886.

https://doi.org/10.1021/CR020719K

Bernal C., Rodríguez K., and Martínez R., 2018, Integrating enzyme immobilization and protein engineering: an alternative path for the development of novel and improved industrial biocatalysts, Biotechnology Advances, 36(5): 1470-1480.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.06.002

Bilal M., Iqbal H., Guo S., Hu H., Wang W., and Zhang X., 2017, State-of-the-art protein engineering approaches using biological macromolecules: A review from immobilization to implementation view point, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 108: 893-901.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.182

Bollella P., Gorton L., and Antiochia R., 2018, Direct electron transfer of dehydrogenases for development of 3rd generation biosensors and enzymatic fuel cells, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 18(5): 1319.

https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051319

Christwardana M., Chung Y., and Kwon Y., 2017, A new biocatalyst employing pyrenecarboxaldehyde as an anodic catalyst for enhancing the performance and stability of an enzymatic biofuel cell, Npg Asia Materials, 9(6): e386.

https://doi.org/10.1038/AM.2017.75

Christwardana M., Kim D., Chung Y., and Kwon Y., 2018, A hybrid biocatalyst consisting of silver nanoparticle and naphthalenethiol self-assembled monolayer prepared for anchoring glucose oxidase and its use for an enzymatic biofuel cell, Applied Surface Science, 429: 180-186.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSUSC.2017.07.023

Chung Y., Ahn Y., Christwardana M., Kim H., and Kwon Y., 2016, Development of a glucose oxidase-based biocatalyst adopting both physical entrapment and crosslinking, and its use in biofuel cells, Nanoscale, 8(17): 9201-9210.

https://doi.org/10.1039/c6nr00902f

Chung Y., Tannia D., and Kwon Y., 2018, Glucose biofuel cells using bi-enzyme catalysts including glucose oxidase, horseradish peroxidase and terephthalaldehyde crosslinker, Chemical Engineering Journal, 334: 1085-1092.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2017.10.121

Cooney M., Svoboda V., Lau C., Martin G., and Minteer S., 2008, Enzyme catalysed biofuel cells, Energy and Environmental Science, 1: 320-337.

https://doi.org/10.1039/B809009B

Cosnier S., Gross A., Goff A., and Holzinger M. 2016, Recent advances on enzymatic glucose/oxygen and hydrogen/oxygen biofuel cells: Achievements and limitations, Journal of Power Sources, 325: 252-263.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2016.05.133

Deng L., Wang F., Chen H., Shang L., Wang L., Wang T., and Dong S., 2008, A biofuel cell with enhanced performance by multilayer biocatalyst immobilized on highly ordered macroporous electrode, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 24(2): 329-333.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2008.04.006

Gross A., Chen X., Giroud F., Abreu C., Goff A., Holzinger M., and Cosnier S., 2017, A high power buckypaper biofuel cell: exploiting 1,10-Phenanthroline-5,6-dione with FAD-dependent dehydrogenase for catalytically-powerful glucose oxidation, ACS Catalysis, 7: 4408-4416.

https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSCATAL.7B00738

Hou C., Yang D., Liang B., and Liu A., 2014, Enhanced performance of a glucose/O(2) biofuel cell assembled with laccase-covalently immobilized three-dimensional macroporous gold film-based biocathode and bacterial surface displayed glucose dehydrogenase-based bioanode, Analytical Chemistry, 86(12): 6057-6063.

https://doi.org/10.1021/ac501203n

Huang J., Zhao P., Jin X., Wang Y., Yuan H., and Zhu X., 2020, Enzymatic biofuel cells based on protein engineering: recent advances and future prospects, Biomaterials Science, 8: 5230-5240.

https://doi.org/10.1039/d0bm00925c

Huang X., Zhang L., Zhang Z., Guo S., Shang H., Li Y., and Liu J., 2019, Wearable biofuel cells based on the classification of enzyme for high power outputs and lifetimes, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 124-125: 40-52.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2018.09.086

Hyun K., Han S., Koh W., and Kwon Y., 2015, Fabrication of biofuel cell containing enzyme catalyst immobilized by layer-by-layer method, Journal of Power Sources, 286: 197-203.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2015.03.136

Jayapiriya U., and Goel S., 2020, Surface modified 3D printed carbon bioelectrodes for glucose/O2 enzymatic biofuel cell: Comparison and optimization, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 42: 100811.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SETA.2020.100811

Jeon S., Lee J., Lee J., Kang S., Park C., and Kim S., 2008, Optimization of cell conditions for enzymatic fuel cell using statistical analysis, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 14: 338-343.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JIEC.2008.01.006

Kamitaka Y., Tsujimura S., Setoyama N., Kajino T., and Kano K., 2007, Fructose/dioxygen biofuel cell based on direct electron transfer-type bioelectrocatalysis, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics: PCCP, 9(15): 1793-1801.

https://doi.org/10.1039/B617650J

Kar P., Wen H., Li H., Minteer S., and Barton S., 2011, Simulation of multistep enzyme-catalyzed methanol oxidation in biofuel cells, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 158(5): B580.

https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3561690

Li X., Lv P., Yao Y., Feng Q., Mensah A., Li D., and Wei Q., 2020, A novel single-enzymatic biofuel cell based on highly flexible conductive bacterial cellulose electrode utilizing pollutants as fuel, Chemical Engineering Journal, 379(1): 122316.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2019.122316

Liang K.W., 2024, Application and economic analysis of pyrolysis technology for industrial waste in biofuel production, Journal of Energy Bioscience, 15(1): 48-59.

https://doi.org/10.5376/jeb.2024.15.0006

Liu S., Bilal M., Rizwan K., Gul I., Rasheed T., and Iqbal H., 2021, Smart chemistry of enzyme immobilization using various support matrices - a review, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 190(1): 396-408.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.09.006

Madavi T., Chauhan S., Keshri A., Alavilli H., Choi K., and Pamidimarri S., 2021, Whole-cell biocatalysis: advancements toward the biosynthesis of fuels, Biofuels, 16(3): 859-876.

https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2331

Mateo C., Palomo J., Fernandez-Lorente G., Guisán J., and Fernández-Lafuente R., 2007, Improvement of enzyme activity, stability and selectivity via immobilization techniques, Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 40: 1451-1463.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENZMICTEC.2007.01.018

Meredith M., and Minteer S., 2012, Biofuel cells: enhanced enzymatic bioelectrocatalysis, Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry, 5: 157-179.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anchem-062011-143049

Minteer S., Liaw B., and Cooney M., 2007, Enzyme-based biofuel cells, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 18(3): 228-234.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COPBIO.2007.03.007

Mishra A., Bhatt R., Bajpai J., and Bajpai A., 2021, Nanomaterials based biofuel cells: a review, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(36): 19085-19105.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2021.03.024

Nguyen K., Giroud F., and Minteer S., 2014, Improved bioelectrocatalytic oxidation of sucrose in a biofuel cell with an enzyme cascade assembled on a DNA scaffold, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 161(14): H930.

https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0761414JES

Pelosi D., Barelli L., Montegiove N., Calzoni E., Cesaretti A., Michele A., Emiliani C., and Gammaitoni L., 2022, Immobilizing enzymes on a commercial polymer: performance analysis of a GOx-Laccase based enzymatic biofuel cell assembly, Energies, 15(6): 2182.

https://doi.org/10.3390/en15062182

Perveen R., Nasar A., Kanchi S., and Kashmery H., 2021, Development of a ternerry condunting composite (PPy/Au/CNT@Fe3O4) immobilized FRT/GOD bioanode for glucose/oxygen biofuel cell applications, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46: 3259-3269.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.02.175

Poulpiquet A., Ciaccafava A., and Lojou E., 2014, New trends in enzyme immobilization at nanostructured interfaces for efficient electrocatalysis in biofuel cells, Electrochimica Acta, 126: 104-114.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ELECTACTA.2013.07.133

Rasmussen M., Abdellaoui S., and Minteer S., 2016, Enzymatic biofuel cells: 30 years of critical advancements, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 76: 91-102.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2015.06.029

Rehm F., Chen S., and Rehm B., 2016, Enzyme engineering for in situ immobilization, Molecules, 21(10): 1370.

https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21101370

Ruff A., Conzuelo F., and Schuhmann W., 2019, Bioelectrocatalysis as the basis for the design of enzyme-based biofuel cells and semi-artificial biophotoelectrodes, Nature Catalysis, 3: 214-224.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0381-9

Scherbahn V., Putze M., Dietzel B., Heinlein T., Schneider J., and Lisdat F., 2014, Biofuel cells based on direct enzyme-electrode contacts using PQQ-dependent glucose dehydrogenase/bilirubin oxidase and modified carbon nanotube materials, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 61: 631-638.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.05.027

Shao M., Zafar M., Falk M., Ludwig R., Sygmund C., Peterbauer C., Guschin D., MacAodha D., Conghaile P., Leech D., Toscano M., Shleev S., Schuhmann W., and Gorton L., 2013, Optimization of a membraneless glucose/oxygen enzymatic fuel cell based on a bioanode with high coulombic efficiency and current density, Chemphyschem : a European Journal of Chemical Physics and Physical Chemistry, 14(10): 2260-2279.

https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201300046

Singh R., Tiwari M., Singh R., and Lee J., 2013, From protein engineering to immobilization: promising strategies for the upgrade of industrial enzymes, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 14: 1232-1277.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14011232

Wen D., and Eychmüller A., 2016, Enzymatic biofuel cells on porous nanostructures, Small, 12(34): 4649-4661.

https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201600906

Wu G., Gao Y., Zhao D., Ling P., and Gao F., 2017, Methanol/oxygen enzymatic biofuel cell using laccase and NAD+-dependent dehydrogenase cascades as biocatalysts on carbon nanodots electrodes, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 9(46): 40978-40986.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b12295

Xiao X., Xia H., Wu R., Bai L., Yan L., Magner E., Cosnier S., Lojou E., Zhu Z., and Liu A., 2019, Tackling the challenges of enzymatic (Bio)fuel cells, Chemical Reviews, 119(16): 9509-9558.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00115

Yamamoto K., Matsumoto T., Shimada S., Tanaka T., and Kondo A., 2013, Starchy biomass-powered enzymatic biofuel cell based on amylases and glucose oxidase multi-immobilized bioanode, New Biotechnology, 30(5): 531-535.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2013.04.005

Yimamumaimaiti T., Lu X., Zhang J., Wang L., and Zhu J., 2020, Efficient blood-toleration enzymatic biofuel cell via in situ protection of enzyme catalyst, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 12(37): 41429-41436.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c11186

Yu E., and Scott K., 2010, Enzymatic biofuel cells—fabrication of enzyme electrodes, Energies, 3: 23-42.

https://doi.org/10.3390/EN3010023

Zebda A., Gondran C., Goff A., Holzinger M., Cinquin P., and Cosnier S., 2011, Mediatorless high-power glucose biofuel cells based on compressed carbon nanotube-enzyme electrodes, Nature Communications, 2(1): 370.

https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1365

Zhang J., Wang Y., Huang K., Huang K., Jiang H., and Wang X., 2021, Enzyme-based biofuel cells for biosensors and in vivo power supply, Nano Energy, 84: 105853.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NANOEN.2021.105853

Zhou J., Liu C., Yu H., Tang N., and Lei C., 2023, Research progresses and application of biofuel cells based on immobilized enzymes, Applied Sciences, 13(10): 5917.

https://doi.org/10.3390/app13105917