1 Introduction

The global energy landscape is undergoing a significant transformation as the world seeks sustainable and renewable energy sources to mitigate climate change and reduce dependence on fossil fuels. Among the various renewable energy options, biofuels have emerged as a promising alternative. Cellulosic ethanol, derived from the fibrous parts of plants, stands out due to its potential to utilize non-food biomass, thereby avoiding the food vs. fuel debate associated with first-generation biofuels. The production of cellulosic ethanol involves converting lignocellulosic biomass into fermentable sugars, which are then fermented into ethanol. This process not only provides a renewable source of energy but also contributes to reducing greenhouse gas emissions (Schmer et al., 2008; Shen et al., 2013).

Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) is a perennial warm-season grass native to North America, recognized for its high biomass yield and adaptability to various environmental conditions. It has been identified as a prime candidate for cellulosic ethanol production due to its robust growth, low agricultural input requirements, and significant carbon sequestration potential (McLaughlin and Kszos, 2005; Bai et al., 2022). Research has shown that switchgrass can produce substantial biomass even on marginal lands, making it an economically viable and environmentally sustainable bioenergy crop (Schmer et al., 2008; Norkevičienė et al., 2016). Additionally, advancements in genetic engineering have further enhanced the biofuel potential of switchgrass by improving its biomass yield and reducing lignin content, which is a major barrier to efficient biofuel production (Shen et al., 2013; Mazarei et al., 2020).

This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the role of switchgrass in cellulosic ethanol production, covering agronomic practices, genetic improvements, and environmental benefits related to switchgrass cultivation. The study seeks to highlight the technological advancements and challenges in optimizing switchgrass as a bioenergy feedstock. The significance of this research lies in its potential to inform future research directions and policy decisions, ultimately contributing to the development of sustainable biofuel production systems.

2 Switchgrass as a Feedstock for Cellulosic Ethanol

2.1 Biological and agronomic characteristics

Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) is a C4, warm-season, perennial native grass that has been strongly recommended as an ideal biofuel feedstock due to its high productivity and broad adaptability to various environmental conditions (Kim et al., 2020). It can be cultivated in both lowland and upland regions, depending on local soil and environmental conditions, making it suitable for diverse geographical areas (Gu and Wylie, 2017). Additionally, switchgrass has a deep root system that enhances its resilience to drought and other environmental stresses, contributing to its adaptability and sustainability as a bioenergy crop (Li et al., 2022).

Switchgrass has demonstrated significant biomass yield potential, with field trials showing annual yields ranging from 5.2 to 11.1 Mg/ha (Schmer et al., 2008). The yield can be influenced by factors such as nitrogen fertilization, which has been shown to increase aboveground biomass yield by 1.2 times compared to unfertilized controls (Li et al., 2022). Moreover, genetic improvements and optimized agronomic practices can further enhance biomass yields, making switchgrass a highly productive feedstock for cellulosic ethanol production (Fu et al., 2011; Yan et al., 2018).

2.2 Environmental benefits

Switchgrass cultivation has been shown to improve soil health by enhancing soil carbon and nitrogen content and maintaining microbial diversity and activity (Li et al., 2022). The deep root system of switchgrass helps in reducing soil erosion and improving soil structure, which contributes to better soil health and sustainability (Gu and Wylie, 2017). Additionally, switchgrass can be grown on marginal lands, which helps in preventing soil degradation and promoting soil conservation (Wullschleger et al., 2010).

Switchgrass has a high potential for carbon sequestration, which can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Studies have shown that cellulosic ethanol derived from switchgrass can result in greenhouse gas emissions that are 94% lower than those from gasoline (Schmer et al., 2008). The deep root system of switchgrass also contributes to long-term carbon storage in the soil, further enhancing its environmental benefits (Keshwani and Cheng, 2009).

2.3 Economic viability

The cost of cultivating and harvesting switchgrass is relatively low compared to other bioenergy crops, primarily due to its low requirements for agricultural inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides (Keshwani and Cheng, 2009). Field trials have shown that switchgrass can be managed with minimal inputs while still achieving high biomass yields, making it an economically viable option for biofuel production (Schmer et al., 2008). Additionally, advancements in genetic modification and agronomic practices can further reduce cultivation costs and improve biomass yield (Fu et al., 2011; Yan et al., 2018).

The market for cellulosic ethanol is growing, driven by increasing demand for renewable energy sources and government policies promoting biofuels. Switchgrass, with its high biomass yield and low input requirements, is well-positioned to capitalize on these market trends (Weijde et al., 2013). Economic analyses have shown that switchgrass can produce 540% more renewable energy than the nonrenewable energy consumed in its production, highlighting its profitability as a bioenergy crop (Schmer et al., 2008). Furthermore, the development of value-added products from switchgrass, such as bio-oil and fiber composites, can enhance its market potential and profitability (Keshwani and Cheng, 2009).

3 Technical Processes in Switchgrass-Based Cellulosic Ethanol Production

3.1 Pretreatment methods

Pretreatment is a crucial step in the conversion of switchgrass to cellulosic ethanol, as it helps to break down the complex structure of lignocellulosic biomass, making the cellulose more accessible for enzymatic hydrolysis. Various pretreatment methods have been explored, including mechanical, chemical, and biological strategies.

Mechanical pretreatment involves physical processes such as milling or grinding to reduce the particle size and increase the surface area of the biomass. Chemical pretreatment methods include the use of acids, alkalis, and solvents. For instance, dilute acid (DA) and ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) are common chemical pretreatments that have been shown to be effective in breaking down the lignin and hemicellulose components of switchgrass (Figure 1) (Tao et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2020). Biological pretreatment involves the use of microorganisms or enzymes to degrade lignin and hemicellulose, making the cellulose more accessible. This method is often combined with other pretreatment strategies to enhance efficiency (Chen et al., 2018; Kothari et al., 2018).

Different pretreatment methods vary in their efficiency and the challenges they present. Chemical pretreatments such as dilute acid and ionic liquid pretreatment have shown high efficiency in reducing lignin content and increasing enzymatic saccharification rates. For example, ionic liquid pretreatment resulted in a 96% glucan yield in 24 hours, significantly enhancing the rate of enzyme hydrolysis compared to dilute acid pretreatment (Li et al., 2010). However, the cost and environmental impact of chemical pretreatments, particularly those involving ionic liquids, can be significant challenges (Li et al., 2010; Smullen et al., 2017).

Mechanical pretreatments, while less costly, often require high energy inputs and may not be as effective in breaking down lignin. Biological pretreatments are environmentally friendly but can be slower and less efficient compared to chemical methods (Chen et al., 2018; Kothari et al., 2018). Overall, the choice of pretreatment method depends on a balance between efficiency, cost, and environmental considerations.

3.2 Enzymatic Hydrolysis

Enzymatic hydrolysis is a critical step in converting pretreated biomass into fermentable sugars. Advances in enzyme technologies have focused on improving the efficiency and reducing the cost of enzymes. Recent studies have demonstrated the use of engineered enzymes and enzyme cocktails that can more effectively break down cellulose and hemicellulose into simple sugars (Sundar et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2020). For instance, the use of a combination of cellulases and β-glucosidase has been shown to significantly increase glucose yields from pretreated switchgrass (Sundar et al., 2014).

Several factors affect the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis, including the type of pretreatment used, enzyme loading, and the presence of inhibitors. Pretreatment methods that effectively reduce lignin content and increase cellulose accessibility tend to result in higher enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency (Li et al., 2010; Kothari et al., 2018). Enzyme loading is another critical factor; higher enzyme concentrations generally lead to higher sugar yields, but also increase costs (Sundar et al., 2014). Additionally, the presence of inhibitors such as furans and phenolic compounds, which can be released during pretreatment, can negatively impact enzyme activity and reduce conversion efficiency (Wang et al., 2020).

3.3 Fermentation techniques

Fermentation is the final step in the production of cellulosic ethanol, where fermentable sugars are converted into ethanol by microorganisms. The choice of microbial strains and optimization of fermentation conditions are crucial for maximizing ethanol yields. Ethanol-producing strains such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and engineered Escherichia coli have been widely used. Recent studies have also explored the use of novel wild yeast strains, such as Scheffersomyces parashehatae, which have shown promising results in fermenting both pentose and hexose sugars (Antunes et al., 2021).

Process optimization involves adjusting parameters such as temperature, pH, and nutrient availability to enhance microbial activity and ethanol production. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) is a commonly used process that combines enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation in a single step, reducing the overall processing time and costs (Wang et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2020).

One of the main challenges in the fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass is the presence of lignin, which can inhibit microbial activity and reduce fermentation efficiency. Lignin-derived compounds, such as phenolics, can be toxic to fermenting microorganisms, leading to lower ethanol yields (Wang et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2020). Strategies to overcome this challenge include the use of pretreatment methods that effectively reduce lignin content and the development of microbial strains that are more tolerant to lignin-derived inhibitors (Wang et al., 2019; Antunes et al., 2021).

4 Technological Evaluation and Optimization

4.1 Process integration

The integration of pretreatment, hydrolysis, and fermentation processes is crucial for optimizing the production of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. Various pretreatment methods such as dilute acid, ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX), and liquid hot water (LHW) have been evaluated for their efficiency in breaking down the lignocellulosic structure of switchgrass to release fermentable sugars (Tao et al., 2011; Martín and Grossmann, 2012). Enzymatic hydrolysis follows these pretreatments to convert the released sugars into glucose and xylose, which are then fermented to produce ethanol. The choice of pretreatment significantly impacts the overall yield and efficiency of the process. For instance, dilute acid hydrolysis followed by molecular sieves for dehydration has been identified as an optimal flowsheet, reducing energy consumption and cooling needs (Martín and Grossmann, 2012). Additionally, the co-fermentation of pentoses and hexoses using novel yeast strains has shown promise in maximizing ethanol yield from both C5 and C6 sugar streams (Antunes et al., 2021).

Energy and water consumption are critical factors in the sustainability of cellulosic ethanol production. Advanced bioconversion technologies, such as multieffect columns and heat integration, have been employed to minimize energy usage (Martín and Grossmann, 2012). Studies have shown that the production of ethanol from switchgrass can lead to significant energy savings and reduced greenhouse gas emissions compared to fossil fuels (Laser et al., 2009; Jin et al., 2019). Water use is another important consideration, with integrated process designs aiming to optimize water recycling and reduce overall consumption. For example, the use of liquid hot water pretreatment has been found to be effective in reducing water usage while maintaining high ethanol yields (Larnaudie et al., 2019; Larnaudie et al., 2021).

4.2 Lifecycle assessment

Lifecycle assessments (LCA) of switchgrass ethanol production have demonstrated favorable energy balances and significant reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Switchgrass ethanol has been shown to produce 540% more renewable energy than the nonrenewable energy consumed during its production (Schmer et al., 2008). Additionally, GHG emissions from switchgrass ethanol are estimated to be 94% lower than those from gasoline, highlighting its potential as a sustainable biofuel (Schmer et al., 2008). The production of ethanol in biorefineries that also generate electricity and other co-products further enhances the environmental performance by reducing the overall carbon footprint (Larnaudie et al., 2021).

When compared to other biofuels, switchgrass ethanol exhibits several advantages. It offers higher energy yields and lower GHG emissions than first-generation biofuels derived from food crops (Jin et al., 2019). Moreover, the use of marginal lands for switchgrass cultivation avoids competition with food production and contributes to land-use efficiency. Studies have also shown that switchgrass ethanol can be economically competitive with gasoline, especially when advanced pretreatment and fermentation technologies are employed (Laser et al., 2009; Larnaudie et al., 2019). The integration of co-products such as furfural and acetic acid in biorefineries further improves the economic viability and sustainability of switchgrass ethanol (Larnaudie et al., 2019; Larnaudie et al., 2021).

4.3 Advances in genetic engineering

Genetic engineering has played a significant role in enhancing the productivity of switchgrass for biofuel production. Advances in genetic modifications have led to the development of switchgrass varieties with improved biomass yield, stress tolerance, and disease resistance (Schmer et al., 2008). These genetically modified varieties can thrive on marginal lands with minimal agricultural inputs, making them ideal for sustainable biofuel production. Additionally, ongoing research aims to further optimize the genetic traits of switchgrass to enhance its suitability for bioethanol production (Schmer et al., 2008).

Reducing the recalcitrance of lignocellulosic biomass is essential for improving the efficiency of ethanol extraction. Innovations in genetic engineering have focused on modifying the lignin content and composition of switchgrass to make it more amenable to enzymatic hydrolysis (Wang et al., 2020). For instance, pretreatment methods such as sodium hydroxide and nitric acid have been optimized to reduce lignin and hemicellulose content, thereby enhancing the accessibility of cellulose for fermentation (Wang et al., 2020; Hong and Huang, 2024). These advancements in reducing biomass recalcitrance are crucial for achieving higher ethanol yields and lowering production costs.

5 Technological Innovations in Downstream Processing

5.1 Improvements in ethanol recovery technologies

Recent advancements in ethanol recovery technologies have significantly enhanced the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of cellulosic ethanol production from switchgrass. One notable innovation is the use of consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) combined with ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) pretreatment. This approach has shown to improve process efficiency and reduce costs compared to traditional methods. The integration of CBP with AFEX pretreatment not only simplifies the process by combining enzyme production, hydrolysis, and fermentation into a single step but also enhances the overall yield of ethanol (Laser et al., 2009; Chung et al., 2014). Additionally, the use of genetically modified switchgrass with reduced lignin content has been demonstrated to lower the severity of pretreatment required and reduce enzyme dosages by 300-400%, thereby improving ethanol yields and reducing processing costs (Fu et al., 2011).

5.2 Advanced distillation methods for cost reduction

Advanced distillation methods have also been developed to further reduce the costs associated with ethanol production. One such method involves the use of a gas turbine combined cycle for power coproduction, which has been shown to significantly improve the energy efficiency of the distillation process. This method not only reduces the overall energy consumption but also lowers the production costs, making cellulosic ethanol more competitive with gasoline (Laser et al., 2009). Furthermore, the implementation of fast pyrolysis followed by acid hydrolysis and solvent extraction has been identified as an effective strategy for upgrading pyrolytic sugars, leading to improved ethanol yields from switchgrass (Luque et al., 2016). This approach addresses the challenge of biomass heterogeneity and enhances the purity of fermentable carbohydrates, thereby optimizing the distillation process and reducing costs.

6 Case Studies

6.1 Pilot projects

Several pilot projects have been conducted to evaluate the feasibility and performance of switchgrass as a feedstock for cellulosic ethanol production. One notable study managed switchgrass as a biomass energy crop in field trials across 10 farms in the midcontinental U.S. The results demonstrated that switchgrass produced 540% more renewable energy than nonrenewable energy consumed, with greenhouse gas emissions from cellulosic ethanol derived from switchgrass being 94% lower than those from gasoline (Schmer et al., 2008). Another study evaluated three process designs for producing ethanol and electricity from switchgrass, finding that mature technology designs significantly improved both process efficiency and cost relative to base-case cellulosic ethanol technology (Laser et al., 2009). Additionally, a high-resolution techno-ecological model was used to simulate various scenarios for growing switchgrass around a commercial-scale cellulosic ethanol biorefinery in Kansas, showing that the greenhouse gas footprint of ethanol production could be reduced by optimizing soil cultivation and fertilizer application rates (Field et al., 2018).

6.2 Economic and environmental impact

The economic viability and environmental impact of switchgrass-based ethanol production have been extensively studied. A system dynamics model projected that cellulosic ethanol production from switchgrass is economically viable with advanced bioconversion technologies, providing significant environmental benefits such as greenhouse gas reductions and water use savings (Jin et al., 2019). Another study conducted a technoeconomic analysis of six biomass pretreatment processes, revealing limited differentiation in economic performance but highlighting the importance of monomer sugar and ethanol yields (Tao et al., 2011). Furthermore, a spatial multi-feedstock procurement landscape analysis found that including switchgrass in the feedstock mix for a cellulosic biofuel plant could reduce production costs and the carbon footprint, especially when grown on marginal land (Sesmero et al., 2021). Lastly, a life cycle assessment comparing various biomass feedstocks for cellulosic ethanol production indicated that switchgrass-derived ethanol could reduce fossil fuel consumption by 81% and greenhouse gas emissions by 65-77% compared to gasoline, although it did not reduce all environmental impact categories (Daystar et al., 2015).

7 Economic Impact of Switchgrass-Based Biofuel Production

7.1 Economic feasibility and cost reduction strategies

Switchgrass has shown promise as a viable feedstock for cellulosic ethanol production, but its economic feasibility is a critical factor for large-scale adoption. Studies indicate that switchgrass can be economically viable, especially when advanced bioconversion technologies are employed. For instance, a system dynamics model suggests that cellulosic ethanol production from switchgrass is economically viable and can provide significant environmental benefits, such as greenhouse gas reductions and water use savings (Jin et al., 2019). Additionally, field trials have demonstrated that switchgrass can produce 540% more renewable energy than the nonrenewable energy consumed, highlighting its potential for high net energy yields (Schmer et al., 2008).

Cost reduction strategies are essential for making switchgrass-based biofuel production more competitive. One approach is to grow switchgrass on marginal lands, which are typically less expensive and do not compete with food crops. This strategy not only reduces the cost of land but also minimizes the carbon footprint of biofuel production (Sesmero et al., 2021). Moreover, genetic modifications to switchgrass have shown potential in increasing ethanol yield by more than two-fold, thereby improving the economic viability of the crop (Shen et al., 2013).

7.2 Economic implications for farmers and industries

The economic implications of switchgrass-based biofuel production extend to both farmers and industries. For farmers, the willingness to grow switchgrass is influenced by several factors, including contract terms, harvest flexibility, and financial incentives. Studies have shown that shorter contracts, greater harvest flexibility, crop insurance, and cost-share assistance increase the likelihood that farmers will grow switchgrass for bioenergy production (Fewell et al., 2016). This indicates that well-structured contracts and financial support can mitigate the risks and uncertainties associated with switchgrass cultivation.

For industries, the inclusion of switchgrass in the feedstock mix can reduce overall production costs, especially when grown on marginal lands near biorefineries. This reduces transportation costs and the need for land conversion, making the production process more cost-effective (Sesmero et al., 2021). Furthermore, the development of public-private partnerships can play a crucial role in scaling up production and reducing costs through shared investments in research, infrastructure, and technology development.

7.3 Role of public-private partnerships in scaling production

Public-private partnerships are vital for the successful scaling of switchgrass-based biofuel production. These collaborations can facilitate the sharing of resources, knowledge, and risks associated with the development and commercialization of new technologies. For example, partnerships between government agencies, research institutions, and private companies can accelerate the development of advanced bioconversion technologies and genetically modified switchgrass varieties that offer higher yields and lower production costs (Shen et al., 2013).

Moreover, public-private partnerships can help in establishing favorable policies and incentives that encourage the adoption of switchgrass as a biofuel feedstock. These partnerships can also support the creation of supply chains and infrastructure necessary for large-scale production and distribution. By leveraging the strengths of both public and private sectors, these collaborations can drive innovation, reduce costs, and enhance the economic viability of switchgrass-based biofuel production (Fewell et al., 2016; Jin et al., 2019; Sesmero et al., 2021).

8 Challenges and Future Prospects

8.1 Barriers to commercialization

The commercialization of cellulosic ethanol production from switchgrass faces several significant barriers. Economically, the high costs associated with biomass pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis are major hurdles. For instance, the need for chemical and enzymatic pretreatment to solubilize biomass prior to microbial bioconversion remains a significant economic barrier (Chung et al., 2014). Additionally, the variability in biomass composition and yield across different fields and years can affect the reliability of feedstock supply and operational costs, posing further economic challenges (Schmer et al., 2012).

Technically, the recalcitrance of lignocellulosic biomass, which refers to the resistance of plant cell walls to deconstruction, is a critical issue. This recalcitrance limits the accessibility of fermentable sugars, thereby reducing the efficiency of ethanol production (Shen et al., 2013). Moreover, the current pretreatment technologies, such as ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) and dilute acid (DA), show limited differentiation in economic performance, indicating a need for more efficient and cost-effective methods (Tao et al., 2011).

Regulatory challenges also play a role in hindering commercialization. The stringent requirements for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions and the need to meet renewable fuel standards add layers of complexity to the commercialization process. For example, achieving the targets set by the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS2) program is challenging under current land-, se constraints (Jin et al., 2019).

8.2 Innovations for enhancing efficiency

Innovations in genetic engineering and bioprocessing technologies hold promise for overcoming some of the technical barriers. Genetically modified switchgrass with overexpression of the transcription factor PvMYB4 has shown a 2.6-fold increase in cellulosic ethanol yield by reducing lignin content and enhancing the availability of fermentable sugars (Shen et al., 2013). This genetic modification addresses the issue of biomass recalcitrance and could significantly improve the efficiency of ethanol production.

Another promising area of research is the development of consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) systems. For instance, the metabolic engineering of the bacterium Caldicellulosiruptor bescii to directly convert unprocessed switchgrass to ethanol without conventional pretreatment represents a new paradigm in bioprocessing (Chung et al., 2014). This approach could potentially reduce the costs and complexity associated with biomass pretreatment.

Additionally, high-resolution techno-ecological modeling can optimize the integration of switchgrass into existing agricultural systems, thereby reducing GHG emissions and improving the overall sustainability of cellulosic ethanol production (Field et al., 2018). This modeling can help identify the best practices for soil cultivation and fertilizer application, further enhancing the efficiency and environmental performance of biofuel production.

8.3 Policy and incentives

Government policies and incentives play a crucial role in promoting the development and commercialization of cellulosic ethanol. The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS2) program mandates the production of 16 billion gallons of cellulosic biofuels by 2022, providing a significant market driver for the industry (Jin et al., 2019). However, achieving these targets requires supportive policies that address land-use constraints and promote the conversion of marginal lands to energy crop production.

Subsidies and tax incentives for bioenergy crops like switchgrass can also encourage farmers to adopt these crops, thereby ensuring a stable feedstock supply for biorefineries. For example, existing subsidized switchgrass plantings have been shown to achieve suboptimal GHG mitigation, indicating the need for more targeted and effective policy measures (Field et al., 2018).

Furthermore, research funding and grants for developing advanced bioconversion technologies and improving biomass yield and quality are essential for overcoming the technical and economic barriers to commercialization. Continued investment in genetic and agronomic research can lead to the development of improved switchgrass cultivars and management practices, thereby enhancing the overall viability of cellulosic ethanol production (Mitchell et al., 2008).

9 Concluding Remarks

Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) has emerged as a highly promising feedstock for cellulosic ethanol production due to its high biomass yield, low agricultural input requirements, and significant environmental benefits. Field trials have demonstrated that switchgrass can produce substantial net energy yields, with an average of 60 GJ·ha⁻¹·y⁻¹, and can generate 540% more renewable energy than nonrenewable energy consumed. Additionally, switchgrass-derived ethanol has been shown to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 94% compared to gasoline.

Research has highlighted the importance of pretreatment processes to enhance the yield of fermentable sugars from switchgrass. Various pretreatment methods, including the use of sodium hydroxide, methanol, sulfuric acid, and ammonia, have been evaluated for their effectiveness in improving conversion yields while minimizing costs and environmental impacts. Genetic modifications, such as the down-regulation of the caffeic acid O-methyltransferase gene, have also been shown to reduce lignin content and improve ethanol yields by up to 38%. Furthermore, the overexpression of the transcription factor PvMYB4 has led to a 2.6-fold increase in cellulosic ethanol yield by reducing recalcitrance.

Switchgrass not only serves as a feedstock for ethanol production but also offers other value-added applications, such as gasification, bio-oil production, and fiber reinforcement in thermoplastic composites. The integration of sustainability assessments has demonstrated that cellulosic ethanol production from switchgrass is economically viable and provides significant environmental and social benefits.

The future of switchgrass in renewable energy is promising, with ongoing advancements in genetic engineering and agronomic practices expected to further enhance its viability as a bioenergy crop. Improved genetics and agronomics are anticipated to increase biomass yields and optimize feedstock composition for bioenergy applications. The development of advanced bioconversion technologies and efficient pretreatment methods will likely reduce production costs and improve ethanol yields, making switchgrass a more competitive alternative to fossil fuels.

Switchgrass's potential to grow on marginal cropland and its positive environmental impacts, such as carbon sequestration and soil remediation, position it as a sustainable option for large-scale biofuel production. As the demand for renewable energy sources continues to rise, switchgrass is expected to play a crucial role in meeting biofuel targets and reducing dependence on nonrenewable energy sources.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the reviewers for identifying and analyzing potential areas for improvement in this paper. Your feedback prompted us to reassess key issues in the research and engage in a more in-depth exploration during the revision process.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors affirm that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Antunes F., Rajan K., Djioleu A., Rocha T., Brumano L., Melo Y., Santos J., Rosa C., Carrier D., and Silva S., 2021, Sustainable second-generation ethanol production from switchgrass biomass via co-fermentation of pentoses and hexoses using novel wild yeasts, BioEnergy Research, 15: 1157-1168.

https://doi.org/10.1007/S12155-021-10302-3

Bai J., Luo L., Li A., Lai X., Zhang X., Yu Y., Wang H., Wu N., and Zhang L., 2022, Effects of biofuel crop switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) cultivation on soil carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions: a review, Life, 12(12): 2105.

https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122105

Chen Z., Reznicek W., and Wan C., 2018, Deep eutectic solvent pretreatment enabling full utilization of switchgrass, Bioresource Technology, 263: 40-48.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.058

Chung D., Cha M., Guss A., and Westpheling J., 2014, Direct conversion of plant biomass to ethanol by engineered Caldicellulosiruptor bescii, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111: 8931-8936.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1402210111

Daystar J., Reeb C., Gonzalez R., Venditti R., and Kelley S., 2015, Environmental life cycle impacts of cellulosic ethanol in the Southern U.S. produced from loblolly pine, eucalyptus, unmanaged hardwoods, forest residues, and switchgrass using a thermochemical conversion pathway, Fuel Processing Technology, 138: 164-174.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUPROC.2015.04.019

Fewell J., Bergtold J., and Williams J., 2016, Farmers' willingness to contract switchgrass as a cellulosic bioenergy crop in Kansas, Energy Economics, 55: 292-302.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2016.01.015

Field J., Evans S., Marx E., Easter M., Adler P., Dinh T., Willson B., and Paustian K., 2018, High-resolution techno–ecological modelling of a bioenergy landscape to identify climate mitigation opportunities in cellulosic ethanol production, Nature Energy, 3: 211-219.

https://doi.org/10.1038/S41560-018-0088-1

Fu C., Mielenz J., Xiao X., Ge Y., Hamilton C., Rodriguez M., Chen F., Foston M., Ragauskas A., Bouton J., Dixon R., and Wang Z., 2011, Genetic manipulation of lignin reduces recalcitrance and improves ethanol production from switchgrass, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108: 3803-3808.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100310108

Gu Y., and Wylie B., 2017, Mapping marginal croplands suitable for cellulosic feedstock crops in the Great Plains, United States, GCB Bioenergy, 9(5): 836-844.

https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12388

Hong W.Y., and Huang W.Z., 2024, Application of sugarcane in ethanol fuel production: theoretical basis and commercial potential, Journal of Energy Bioscience, 15(2): 60-71.

https://doi.org/10.5376/jeb.2024.15.0007

Jin E., Mendis G., and Sutherland J., 2019, Integrated sustainability assessment for a bioenergy system: a system dynamics model of switchgrass for cellulosic ethanol production in the U.S. midwest, Journal of Cleaner Production, 234(10): 503-520.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.06.205

Keshwani D., and Cheng J., 2009, Switchgrass for bioethanol and other value-added applications: a review, Bioresource Technology, 100(4): 1515-1523.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.035

Kim S., Kim S., Cho J., Park S., Perez F., and Kiniry J., 2020, Simulated biomass, climate change impacts, and nitrogen management to achieve switchgrass biofuel production at diverse sites in U.S., Agronomy, 10(4): 503.

https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040503

Kothari N., Holwerda E., Cai C., Kumar R., and Wyman C., 2018, Biomass augmentation through thermochemical pretreatments greatly enhances digestion of switchgrass by Clostridium thermocellum, Biotechnology for Biofuels, 11: 1-14.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1216-7

Larnaudie V., Ferrari M., and Lareo C., 2019, Techno-economic analysis of a liquid hot water pretreated switchgrass biorefinery: Effect of solids loading and enzyme dosage on enzymatic hydrolysis, Biomass and Bioenergy, 130: 105394.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105394

Larnaudie V., Ferrari M., and Lareo C., 2021, Life cycle assessment of ethanol produced in a biorefinery from liquid hot water pretreated switchgrass, Renewable Energy, 176: 606-616.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2021.05.094

Laser M., Jin H., Jayawardhana K., and Lynd L., 2009, Coproduction of ethanol and power from switchgrass, Biofuels, 3(2): 195-218.

https://doi.org/10.1002/BBB.133

Li C., Knierim B., Manisseri C., Arora R., Scheller H., Auer M., Vogel K., Simmons B., and Singh S., 2010, Comparison of dilute acid and ionic liquid pretreatment of switchgrass: biomass recalcitrance, delignification and enzymatic saccharification, Bioresource Technology, 101(13): 4900-4906.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.066

Li X., Petipas R., Antoch A., Liu Y., Stel H., Bell-Dereske L., Smercina D., Bekkering C., Evans S., Tiemann L., and Friesen M., 2022, Switchgrass cropping systems affect soil carbon and nitrogen and microbial diversity and activity on marginal lands, GCB Bioenergy, 14: 918-940.

https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12949

Luque L., Oudenhoven S., Westerhof R., Rossum G., Berruti F., Kersten S., and Rehmann L., 2016, Comparison of ethanol production from corn cobs and switchgrass following a pyrolysis-based biorefinery approach, Biotechnology for Biofuels, 9: 242.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0661-4

Martín M., and Grossmann I., 2012, Energy optimization of bioethanol production via hydrolysis of switchgrass, Aiche Journal, 58: 1538-1549.

https://doi.org/10.1002/AIC.12735

Mazarei M., Baxter H., Srivastava A., Li G., Xie H., Dumitrache A., Rodriguez M., Natzke J., Zhang J., Turner G., Sykes R., Davis M., Udvardi M., Wang Z., Davison B., Blancaflor E., Tang Y., and Stewart C., 2020, Silencing folylpolyglutamate synthetase1 (FPGS1) in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) improves lignocellulosic biofuel production, Frontiers in Plant Science, 11: 843.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00843

McLaughlin S., and Kszos L., 2005, Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States, Biomass & Bioenergy, 28: 515-535.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2004.05.006

Mitchell R., Vogel K., and Sarath G., 2008, Managing and enhancing switchgrass as a bioenergy feedstock, Biofuels, 2(6): 530-539.

https://doi.org/10.1002/BBB.106

Norkevičienė E., Lemežienė N., Cesevičienė J., and Butkutė B., 2016, Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) from North Dakota—a new bioenergy crop for the nemoral zone of Europe, Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 47: 64-74.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2016.1232098

Schmer M., Vogel K., Mitchell R., and Perrin R., 2008, Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105: 464-469.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704767105

Schmer M., Vogel K., Mitchell R., Dien B., Jung H., and Casler M., 2012, Temporal and spatial variation in switchgrass biomass composition and theoretical ethanol yield,Agronomy Journal, 104: 54-64.

https://doi.org/10.2134/AGRONJ2011.0195

Sesmero J., Trull N., and Gramig B., 2021, Economic viability and carbon footprint of switchgrass for cellulosic biofuels: insights from a spatial multi‐feedstock procurement landscape analysis, GCB Bioenergy, 13(7): 1054-1070..

https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12843

Shen H., Poovaiah C., Ziebell A., Tschaplinski T., Pattathil S., Gjersing E., Engle N., Katahira R., Pu Y., Sykes R., Chen F., Ragauskas A., Mielenz J., Hahn M., Davis M., Stewart C., and Dixon R., 2013, Enhanced characteristics of genetically modified switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) for high biofuel production, Biotechnology for Biofuels, 6: 71.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-71

Smullen E., Finnan J., Dowling D., and Mulcahy P., 2017, Bioconversion of switchgrass: identification of a leading pretreatment option based on yield, cost and environmental impact, Renewable Energy, 111: 638-645.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2017.04.059

Sundar S., Bergey N., Salamanca-cardona L., Stipanovic A., and Driscoll M., 2014, Electron beam pretreatment of switchgrass to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis to produce sugars for biofuels, Carbohydrate Polymers, 100: 195-201.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.04.103

Tao L., Aden A., Elander R., Pallapolu V., Lee Y., Garlock R., Balan V., Dale B., Kim Y., Mosier N., Ladisch M., Falls M., Holtzapple M., Sierra R., Shi J., Ebrik M., Redmond T., Yang B., Wyman C., Hames B., Thomas S., and Warner R., 2011, Process and technoeconomic analysis of leading pretreatment technologies for lignocellulosic ethanol production using switchgrass, Bioresource Technology, 102(24): 11105-11114.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.051

Wang F., Shi D., Han J., Zhang G., Jiang X., Yang M., Wu Z., Fu C., Li Z., Xian M., and Zhang H., 2020, Comparative study on pretreatment processes for different utilization purposes of switchgrass, ACS Omega, 5: 21999-22007.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c01047

Wang P., Chen Y., Wang Y., Lee Y., Zong W., Taylor S., McDonald T., and Wang Y., 2019, Towards comprehensive lignocellulosic biomass utilization for bioenergy production: efficient biobutanol production from acetic acid pretreated switchgrass with Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4, Applied Energy, 236: 551-559.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2018.12.011

Weijde T., Kamei C., Torres A., Vermerris W., Dolstra O., Visser R., and Trindade L., 2013, The potential of C4 grasses for cellulosic biofuel production, Frontiers in Plant Science, 4: 107.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00107

Wullschleger S., Davis E., Borsuk M., Gunderson C., and Lynd L., 2010, Biomass production in switchgrass across the United States: database description and determinants of yield, Agronomy Journal, 102: 1158-1168.

https://doi.org/10.2134/AGRONJ2010.0087

Yan J., Liu Y., Wang K., Li D., Hu Q., and Zhang W., 2018, Overexpression of OsPIL1 enhanced biomass yield and saccharification efficiency in switchgrass, Plant Science : an International Journal of Experimental Plant Biology, 276: 143-151.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.08.012